TPO INTEGRATED 41
There has been many debates among whether the new regulations for handling and storing coal ash are necessary or not. The lecture says that the new regulations are necessary. However, the reading refutes saying that there is no need for new regulations as they will cause negative effects.
The first point of dispute is if there are regulations exist or not. The lecture claims that the regulations that exist now are only applied for the new land fills. The linear not required to be applied for the old land fills and that contaminant the drinking water. On the other hand, the reading contradicts this point by saying that the government required companies to use linear that prevent coal ash materials from leaking into the soil.
Another controversial issue is the concerns about recycling coal ash. The lecturer says other materials like mercury have been recycled for about 50 years and there are very few concerns about them. But the reading opposes this point saying that consumers may concern that recycled coal as products are just too dangerous, and may stop buying the products
The final issue of dispute is the increase in the cost. The professor says that the result of the handling and storage will worth it. If the cost will increase for the power companies for about 15 billion dollars, that would not too much after doing the math. Each house hold will pay 1 % in his electric bill that is not too much for having cleaner environment. Yet, the reading disagrees. It claims that the increase in the cost will force the power companies to increase the bill of electricity, which would not be welcomed by the general public.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-15 | Salu | 70 | view |
| 2020-06-08 | maya14 | 3 | view |
| 2019-12-18 | lucasantunes | 80 | view |
| 2019-10-24 | fateme ozggoli | 85 | view |
| 2019-03-05 | ilda | 85 | view |
- Tpo Delta 6 exam 3
- parent are the best teachers 60
- TPO-29 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? To improve the quality of education, universities should spend money on salaries university professors. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 80
- All university students should required to talk history courses not matter what is their field . 70
- integrated tpo 16 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... as they will cause negative effects. The first point of dispute is if there a...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...materials from leaking into the soil. Another controversial issue is the conce...
^^^^
Line 6, column 247, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e reading opposes this point saying that consumers may concern that recycled coal...
^^
Line 6, column 301, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y concern that recycled coal as products are just too dangerous, and may stop bu...
^^
Line 6, column 326, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oal as products are just too dangerous, and may stop buying the products ...
^^
Line 6, column 360, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...erous, and may stop buying the products The final issue of dispute is the increa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 84, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ase in the cost. The professor says that the result of the handling and storage w...
^^
Line 9, column 294, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g the math. Each house hold will pay 1 % in his electric bill that is not too muc...
^^
Line 9, column 541, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ity, which would not be welcomed by the general public.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1409.0 1373.03311258 103% => OK
No of words: 290.0 270.72406181 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85862068966 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42898911265 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 145.348785872 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510344827586 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 404.1 419.366225166 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.0372194245 49.2860985944 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.9333333333 110.228320801 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 21.698381199 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.4 7.06452816374 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 4.19205298013 215% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.46865467596 0.272083759551 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146143350788 0.0996497079465 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0868238224285 0.0662205650399 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.269888339615 0.162205337803 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0424316954746 0.0443174109184 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.3589403974 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 53.8541721854 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.0289183223 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.2367328918 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.3 8.42419426049 87% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 63.6247240618 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.