the scores of team A, B and C over 4 different seasons
The bar chart compares three different teams in terms of their points scored over a four-year period from 2002 to 2005.
The scores of all the teams fluctuated during the period given. It is also clear that the points scored by team B were generally much higher than the scores of the other teams.
In 2002, team B scored 82 points, compared with 100 points scored by team C and only 5 points scored by team C. In the 2002-2004 period, there was a considerable decrease in the scores of team B, while the figures for team A can be seen a rapid increase. There were 60 points scored by team B in 2003, fell to 43 points in 2004. By contrast, team A scored 11 points in 2003, then reached its peak of 35 points in 2004. At the same time, the scores of team C fluctuated slightly, rising by 5 points in 2003 before falling to 12 points in 2004.
2005 experienced declines in the scores of team A and C to 8 points and 5 points respectively. However, there was a rise in the team B to 55 points.
- as well as making money, businesses also have social responsibilities. Do you agree or disagree? 61
- Internet users as percentage of population. 78
- the expenditure on fast food by income groups UK 1990 52
- This chart shows the top eight destination for newlywed British couples in 2010. The results come from a survey of 5000 couples. 56
- the pie charts show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in 2005 and 2010 87
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 803.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.18229166667 4.92477711251 85% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37019227383 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505208333333 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 210.6 283.868780488 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.1 1.45097560976 76% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.0904042052 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.3 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.4 5.23603664747 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.379225773394 0.215688989381 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.192893618428 0.103423049105 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0718814627699 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.260273085456 0.15604864568 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0406567192826 0.0819641961636 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.9 13.2329268293 60% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 94.49 61.2550243902 154% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 4.8 10.3012195122 47% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 6.96 11.4140731707 61% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.55 8.06136585366 81% => OK
difficult_words: 24.0 40.7170731707 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.