TPO INTEGRATED 49

Essay topics:

TPO INTEGRATED 49

Submitted by mariem on Wed, 10/25/2017 - 16:33

Both the reading and the lecture talk about the migration of the humpback. The reading states that the humpback navigate using the stars. However, the lecture refutes this point saying that the humpback are navigating by other things rather than the stars.

First, the reading states that the humpback are intelligent enough to use the stars while the are migrating. For example, the can use night sky for their orientation. But, the lecture opposes. It claims that there is no connection between the whales intelligent and their ability to navigate. For example, ducks are not that intelligient and they are able to navigate.

Second, the reading states that humpback are able to navigate in straight line because they use the stars as an external objects to help them. Yet, the lecture refutes. It claims that animals to move in straight lines they need to send some external forces. For example, the humpbacks have bio magnitude in their brains which help them to navigate by using the earth magnetic field.

Third the reading contends that humpback exhibit spy hoping. It is unusual behavior help them to navigate by looking at the stars. On the other hand, the professor opposes. He says that spy hopping is a rare behavior. It exhibit in some sharks to help them look for animals they want to hunt. It is poor speculation that humpback are using spy hooping to navigate.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-01-15 Salu 70 view
2020-06-08 maya14 3 view
2019-12-18 lucasantunes 80 view
2019-10-24 fateme ozggoli 85 view
2019-03-05 ilda 85 view
>>> More users practiced this topic >>>
Essay Categories
Integrated TOEFL Writing

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 218, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... saying that the humpback are navigating by other things rather than the stars. ...
^^
Line 4, column 91, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...telligent enough to use the stars while the are migrating. For example, the can use nig...
^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 222, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'exhibits'?
Suggestion: exhibits
...that spy hopping is a rare behavior. It exhibit in some sharks to help them look for an...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, look, second, so, third, while, for example, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1158.0 1373.03311258 84% => OK
No of words: 234.0 270.72406181 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94871794872 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38420178382 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 145.348785872 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.491452991453 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 348.3 419.366225166 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 21.2450331126 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.0990461764 49.2860985944 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 64.3333333333 110.228320801 58% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 13.0 21.698381199 60% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 4.61111111111 7.06452816374 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.423273511682 0.272083759551 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126295256446 0.0996497079465 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0724904878389 0.0662205650399 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.256436117534 0.162205337803 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0485786499499 0.0443174109184 110% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.4 13.3589403974 63% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.74 53.8541721854 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.0289183223 65% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.54 12.2367328918 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.05 8.42419426049 84% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 63.6247240618 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.498013245 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.