Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors.
Views differ when it comes to the issue of whether increasing university professors' salaries can lead to an improvement in the quality of education. Being paid more salary provides an incentive for professors and releases their stress and pressure.
The first aspect to point out is that one of the strongest motivations for professors is having higher salaries. It provides a lot of benefits for them which helps them be more enthusiastic to teach more effectively in the class. One of the concerns of university professors who will be motivated by this decision is that they assume if they had other careers, they would be paid much more with much greater ease rather than be involved with a number of students most of whom reluctant in learning . A higher salary means being valued to them what may bolster their self esteem. Motivated professors can inspire students perform well in their studies leading to an improvement in the university's performance. For instance, a professor who is not satisfied with his salary could not spend enough time after his class to help students solve their problems. He keeps leaving the class soon in order not to be confronted with a lot of questions taking all his time. However, an increase in the salary can make him stay longer broadening students' knowledge.
A further more subtle point is that offering more salaries to university professors can help them shed their tension. Like other members of the society, they have their personal lives with a number of financial concerns. Not only can they boost their self-esteem by being paid more, but also they will mentally get healthier by this plan. Since professors have a drastic impact on students' minds, they should be physically and mentally prepared in order to convey their information in the most effective way. For instance, a professor who is in charge of a family of four with lots of incomplete plans in his mind cannot concentrate on what he is teaching to students even though his mental discomfort may not be apparent to students. He might be able to keep his temper when a student keeps asking the same concept he has been explaining for several hours again and again and respond him well though he finds it too unbearable. This may have adverse effects on his soul causing negative reactions at home even toward his family members.
To summarize, spending money on paying more salaries to university professors is highly beneficial since they get stimulated and feel less mentally concerned. It is high time we stopped overlooking the fact that even though most professors teach due to their sheer enthusiasm in shaping students' minds, they need to be satisfied in order to teach well.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | supergirl20 | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-30 | supergirl20 | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-15 | soheila123 | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | kangyan | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-06 | kangyan | 76 | view |
- Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports. Others believe that it is best to use that time doing things together that are related to 76
- TPO 7 Ecocertification for wood companies 76
- People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign countries 71
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign country 69
- Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 498, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...dents most of whom reluctant in learning . A higher salary means being valued to t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, may, so, thus, well, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2251.0 1977.66487455 114% => OK
No of words: 455.0 407.700716846 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94725274725 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61852021839 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65111081297 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505494505495 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 682.2 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.6208122053 48.9658058833 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.473684211 100.406767564 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9473684211 20.6045352989 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.68421052632 5.45110844103 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177948678468 0.236089414692 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0677259132116 0.076458572812 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0589990185904 0.0737576698707 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13751736789 0.150856017488 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0466610198567 0.0645574589148 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 11.7677419355 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.