tpo14
The reading and lecture about a method which is called salvage logging. In the mentioned approach, after a forest fires, dead trees must be removed from forest. The reading provides three reasons that salvage logging is beneficial in several aspects and then supports them. The lecturer casts doubt on the claims made in the article and finds all of arguments dubious. Meanwhile she believes that salvage logging would have serious, long term damage on the forest's future.
First of all, the author of reading declares that dead trees last to decompose for several years if laborers do not remove them, then new trees will not have any chance for the growth. Needless to say through salvage logging -cleaning dead trees-, the new spaces and rooms will be appeared and other species would take advantage of this condition. This point is challenged by the professor. She points out that decomposing trees is a vital process for soil. When a tree starts decomposing, as a matter a fact, it will act as natural process which is advantageous for soil because it can provide soil's needed nutrition.
Secondly, the article contends that after a fire in forest, insects which are harmful will be able to be settled in dead trees and during time, they would show negative impacts on other healthy trees; conversely, the lecturer claims that there is a special beetle which is lives on spruce tree for hundred years without any damage report. Furthermore, there are plentiful of innocent insects or birds which rely on dead trees as nesting; hence, slave logging may harm them also.
Finally, the reading passage states that aforementioned way would assist governments to improve their economy. For instance, dead trees are still one of the best resources for wood companies and their products. Moreover, salvage logging requires a lot of workers; therefore, the communities will reduce the rate of unemployment. This argument is rebutted by the lecturer and she poses that statistical averages have shown that obtained profit through salvage logging is very small. Besides, the governments have to use helicopters or other expensive facilities for removing dead trees. One should not forget that workers will have a temporary job and also the government has to spend much money for their training.
- do you agree or disagree?Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past. 79
- independent- Tpo 43- Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?•Interrupt and correct the mistake right away.•Wait until 85
- tpo18 85
- some students choose to enter the university immediately after high school however others prefer to take time before beginning the university class Which one is better 70
- tpo26 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 370, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Meanwhile,
...cle and finds all of arguments dubious. Meanwhile she believes that salvage logging would...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 299, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a hundred'.
Suggestion: a hundred
...eetle which is lives on spruce tree for hundred years without any damage report. Furthe...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 474, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...ing; hence, slave logging may harm them also. Finally, the reading passage states...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, conversely, finally, first, furthermore, hence, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, then, therefore, while, as to, for instance, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 5.04856512141 277% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1926.0 1373.03311258 140% => OK
No of words: 376.0 270.72406181 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12234042553 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.04702891845 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52414214571 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 145.348785872 149% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574468085106 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 576.0 419.366225166 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.3956907344 49.2860985944 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.0 110.228320801 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8888888889 21.698381199 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.61111111111 7.06452816374 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 4.45695364238 247% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.470415185369 0.272083759551 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135310894631 0.0996497079465 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0736712704057 0.0662205650399 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.279551485312 0.162205337803 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0122639826138 0.0443174109184 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.3589403974 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 63.6247240618 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.