Essay topics:
tpo 40
The reading and the lecture both discuss ...... On the first hand, the reading states that ..... and provides three reasons of support. On the other hand, the professor explain that ......and refutes each of the auther's reasons.
First of all, the article claims that ....... However, the lecture argues that ...... Furthermore, the professore states that ....
In addition, the reading makes the argument is that ...... The lecture argues this point by satating that ....
Lastly, the reading passage argues that .... The lecture counter this claim by pointing out that
Votes
Essay Categories
Essays by user maysmays
:
- tpo 40 40
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily.Use specific reasons and ex 60
- tpo 40 73
- tpo 40 80
- Pterosaurs were an ancient group of winged reptiles that lived alongside the dinosaurs. Many pterosaurs were very large, some as large as a giraffe and with a wingspan of over 12 meters. Paleontologists have long wondered whether large pterosaurs were cap 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, lastly, so, in addition, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 10.4613686534 10% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 22.412803532 49% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 30.3222958057 30% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 487.0 1373.03311258 35% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 85.0 270.72406181 31% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.72941176471 5.08290768461 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.03637027671 4.04702891845 75% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.16254711225 2.5805825403 84% => OK
Unique words: 50.0 145.348785872 34% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.588235294118 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 123.3 419.366225166 29% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 7.0 21.2450331126 33% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 14.1438886724 49.2860985944 29% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 44.2727272727 110.228320801 40% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 7.72727272727 21.698381199 36% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 7.72727272727 7.06452816374 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0260683272782 0.272083759551 10% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0105962659095 0.0996497079465 11% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0119475730696 0.0662205650399 18% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0173025440133 0.162205337803 11% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00197000015493 0.0443174109184 4% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.3589403974 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.83 53.8541721854 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 4.8 11.0289183223 44% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 13.59 12.2367328918 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 22.0 63.6247240618 35% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 3.0 10.7273730684 28% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 4.8 10.498013245 46% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 5.0 11.2008830022 45% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 150 words wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.