tpo34
The reading passage and the lecture both discuss the reasons of sea cow’s extinction. On the first hand, the reading clearly state that there are theories responsible toward the sea cows extinction. On the other hand, the professor explain that these theories are not true and refutes each of the reading reasons.
First of all, the article claims that groups of Siberian people over hunted the sea cows because it were a good source of food. However, The lecture argues that sea cows were huge creature unless they hunted these animals it was not the main reason due to small number of them.
In addition, the reading makes the argument is that the disturbance of ecosystems caused a sever decline in the food like a klep that was the main supply to the sea cows. The lecture argues this point by stating that when the ecosystem changed that had an impact on all creatures not just the sea cows, and the professor provide an example that the ecosystem will effect on whales as well.
Lastly, the reading passage argues that a European the main reason of hunting after 1741. The lecture counter this claim by pointing out that the extinction happened before European coming, and they were small groups of people.
- In order for any work of art—for example, a film, a novel, a poem, or a song—to have merit, it must be understandable to most people.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the state 62
- Nowadays universities are the best place to get the best knowledge from, it. Also, it became an important part of our life in spite of taking valuable information from many different fields, we face much new experience we do not face it before. Furthermor 76
- A recent sales study indicates that consumption of seafood dishes in Bay City restaurants has increased by 30 percent during the past five years. Yet there are no currently operating city restaurants whose specialty is seafood. Mor 26
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position 75
- Some people believe that our ever-increasing use of technology significantly reduces our opportunities for human interaction. Other people believe that technology provides us with new and better ways to communicate and connect with 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 188, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'cows'' or 'cow's'?
Suggestion: cows'; cow's
...are theories responsible toward the sea cows extinction. On the other hand, the prof...
^^^^
Line 5, column 365, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[6]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
...vide an example that the ecosystem will effect on whales as well. Lastly, the readi...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, lastly, so, well, in addition, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1016.0 1373.03311258 74% => OK
No of words: 211.0 270.72406181 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81516587678 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.24207185178 2.5805825403 87% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 145.348785872 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535545023697 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 302.4 419.366225166 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.7011340632 49.2860985944 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.888888889 110.228320801 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4444444444 21.698381199 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.06452816374 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.358549147732 0.272083759551 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15965696932 0.0996497079465 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0856143760827 0.0662205650399 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212172812528 0.162205337803 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0776489596808 0.0443174109184 175% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 53.8541721854 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.2367328918 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 63.6247240618 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.