TPO-44 - Integrated Writing Task
In 1957 a European silver coin dating to the eleventh century was discovered at a Native American archaeological site in the state of Maine in the United States. Many people believed the coin had been originally brought to North America by European explorers known as the Norse, who traveled across the Atlantic Ocean and came into contact with Native Americans almost a thousand years ago.
However, some archaeologists believe that the coin is not a genuine piece of historical evidence but a historical fake; they think that the coin was placed at the site recently by someone who wanted to mislead the public. There are three main reasons why some archaeologists believe that the coin is not genuine historical evidence.
Great Distance from Norse Settlements
First, the Native American site in Maine where the coin was discovered is located very far from other sites documenting a Norse presence in North America. Remains of Norse settlements have been discovered in far eastern Canada. The distance between the Maine site and the Norse settlements in Canada is more than a thousand kilometers, suggesting the coin has no real connection with the settlements.
No Other Coins Found
A second problem is that no other coins have been found at the Canadian sites that were inhabited by the Norse. This suggests that the Norse did not bring any silver coins with them to their North American settlements.
Third, the Norse who traveled to North America would have understood that silver coins would most likely be useless to them. Sitver coins may have been in wide use in Europe at the time, but the Norse, as experienced explorers, would have known that native North Americans did not recognize silver coins as money.
The reading is in great controversy with lecture. While both discussed about a European sliver coin being found, reading gives evidence that the coin is misleading evidence; The lecture broaden hits on it is genuinely a great evidence of being brought to North America by Norse people.
The reading assert that owing to great distance from Norse settelements, which is approximately more than a thousand kilometers, the coin can not have any real connection with the inhabitant.
On the other hand, the professor claim that the Norse people have travelled long distance and may be, they lived in there too for a short time.
Secondly, the writer believes that due to finding no other coins there and lack of documents; it is logical to cast doubt on the Norse people were the ones that bring the sliver coin there. While the lecturer assert that the Norse people travelled back to Europe after a while therefore they could have brought conis there and agian bought them back to Europe and used them.
Utterly, the writer believes that the Norse who travaled to North Amrica would have known that sliver coins are useless to them, because inhabitante there would not recognized them as money. while the teacher is challange the writer idea by claiming that theyknew that it is not consider as credits but as long as they are appealing and intersting they can be used as a way to exchange goods. Moreover,northern people will used them in jewelries and also necklesses.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-19 | Zmx_6 | 85 | view |
| 2023-06-29 | YasamanEsml | 80 | view |
| 2023-06-27 | Vivian Chang | 76 | view |
| 2023-02-16 | reza_fattahi | 80 | view |
| 2022-11-25 | nikki07hung | 85 | view |
- Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?•Interrupt and correct the mistake right away.•Wait until the class or meeting 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The opinions of celebrities, such as famous entertainers and athletes, are more important to younger people than they are to older people. 71
- tpo 46 w task1; 80
- TPO-41 - Integrated Writing TaskBurning coal in power plants produces a waste product called coal ash, a material that contains small amounts of potentially harmful chemicals Environmentalists in the United States are concerned about the damage such harmf 80
- TPO-43 - Independent Writing TaskImagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?-Interrupt and correct the mistake right away 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 13, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'asserts'.
Suggestion: asserts
...h America by Norse people. The reading assert that owing to great distance from Norse...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 166, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'recognize'
Suggestion: recognize
...em, because inhabitante there would not recognized them as money. while the teacher is cha...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 191, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...ere would not recognized them as money. while the teacher is challange the writer ide...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 279, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'considered'.
Suggestion: considered
...y claiming that theyknew that it is not consider as credits but as long as they are appe...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 401, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , northern
...sed as a way to exchange goods. Moreover,northern people will used them in jewelries and ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 423, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'use'
Suggestion: use
...ge goods. Moreover,northern people will used them in jewelries and also necklesses. ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1224.0 1373.03311258 89% => OK
No of words: 250.0 270.72406181 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.896 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53204739292 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 379.8 419.366225166 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 21.2450331126 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.4408532906 49.2860985944 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.0 110.228320801 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7777777778 21.698381199 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.22222222222 7.06452816374 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.366883587099 0.272083759551 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145622644264 0.0996497079465 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0988936134433 0.0662205650399 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203400100994 0.162205337803 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0399515453958 0.0443174109184 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.3589403974 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 53.8541721854 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 11.0289183223 114% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 63.6247240618 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.7273730684 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.498013245 122% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.