The line graph shows the sales of children’ books, adult’s fictions and educational books between 2002 and2006 in one country.
The given line graph illustrates the information about how many children’s books, adult’s fictions and educational books were sold over a four year period in one nation.
Overall, it can be seen that the sales of children's books and educational books climbed and the demand of adult's fictions dipped.
As regards children's books and educational books, the selling stood at approximately 33 and 24 million dollars correspondingly in 2002. There were sharp growths for both of them to roughly around 42 and 32 million dollars until the end of 2002. After that the children's books experienced a gradual rise in the sales for the remaining years to finish at just over 55 million dollars in 2006, which was the highest record of the whole span. On the other hand, as for educational books, having witnessed a mild fluctuation from 2003 to 2005, the sales finally swelled to just over 32 million dollars in 2006, making it the number second book in the rank.
In contrast, Adult's fiction entirely followed the opposite trend. Starting at about 46 million dollars in 2002, the figure being the top most of the opening year, 2002 to 2003 witnessed a rapid dip in the sales to 36 million dollars. Despite declining rapidly, there was a steady rise to 40 million dollars in the next year, followed by a progressive drop to 30 million dollars in the end of the term (2006), which meant that it remained the least popular book.
- The bar chart below shows the estimated percentage of car trips taken by drivers in 2005 72
- Creative artist should always be given the freedom to express their own ideas (picture, music or film) in whichever way they wish. There should be no government restrictions on what they do. What extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- space tourism will it bring positive or negative effects on the world s development Give your own opinion Use exmple based on your experience 58
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 66
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 76
Comments
Essay evaluation report
flaws:
1. doesn't need to go details. just need to focus on the start points, end points, and intersection points. read a sample and Learn it how...:
https://www.testbig.com/ielts-writing-task-i-essays/line-graph-shows-sa…
2. doesn't need math in task I:
change it from:
over a four year period
to:
from 2002 to 2006
and in other of your essays
---------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 6.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 9 10
No. of Words: 245 200
No. of Characters: 1149 1000
No. of Different Words: 130 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.956 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.69 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.546 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 75 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 62 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 28 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 19 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 27.222 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.658 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.333 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.456 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.684 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.18 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, second, so, well, as for, as regards, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1189.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 245.0 196.424390244 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85306122449 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64080686369 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 106.607317073 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542857142857 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 335.7 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.0600539022 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.111111111 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2222222222 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.55555555556 5.23603664747 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301278567337 0.215688989381 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139520113499 0.103423049105 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120880704062 0.0843802449381 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228704288228 0.15604864568 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.12646982277 0.0819641961636 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.