The older people who need employment have to compete with younger ones. What problems can this create ? What are some solutions ?
In recent years, there are strong competitions between older people and younger ones for jobs. This trend has significant impacts on older workers first, before widespreading to community. Also many effective measures can be taken to tackle this problem.
Competing with youngsters, older workers have to face with two main issues. First, older generation seems to suffer more disadvantages in job seeking even when they have the same qualifications and abilities as their younger counterparts. As a result, they may be out of work and could not reach basic needs. Second, strong pressure has a tendency to occur to older people rather than younger ones. Despite many experiences, older workers are not as creative and adaptable as their younger colleagues. They may find difficult to get used to with modern technology and new requirements of labor market. This could lead to psychological deseases such as depression or even heart desease. In long term, it will become the burden of social security.
However, with many initiatives from both goverment and individuals, these problems can be resolved. To each older worker first, they need to be eager to develop new skills to adapt to change at workplace. In addition, younger colleagues should be encouraged to support their old counterparts to get acquaintance with up-to-date technique and facilities. And the most important action is from the goverment. They should recommend companies to apply The Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 to ensure equal opportunities for older candidates besides running many programs that let older people reach the way to earn a living.
In conclusion, it is true that competitions between older people and younger ones for jobs have become increasingly widespread concern. This lead to many problems and of course they can be tackled by the action of both goverment and individuals.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-10-29 | lananhle301 | 89 | view |
- The maps below show the village of Stokeford in 1930 and 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 25
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevent. 61
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Fossil fule is the main source of energy. In some countries, the use of alternative sources of energy is encouraged. To what extent do you think is it a positive or negative development ? 56
- Write about the following topic:Cycling is more environmentally friendly than other forms of transport. Why is it not popular in many places ? An how to increase its popularity ?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 190, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...rst, before widespreading to community. Also many effective measures can be taken to...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, however, if, may, second, so, in addition, in conclusion, of course, such as, as a result, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1595.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31666666667 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95194662704 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.7814485178 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.6111111111 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6666666667 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.83333333333 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266455947523 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0804485188274 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0526947310029 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173869597693 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0164921434279 0.056905535591 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.28 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.