The ability to learn more than one language will be less important in the future. Do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of learning more than one language and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of learning various languages is highly rewarding, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that being bilingual can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the linguistic standpoint, learning an official language can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that globalization, as well as different civilizations, are inextricably bound up. According to my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered more job opportunities. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both cognitive skills and the vernacular distinctly can be observed.
Within the realm of conversational science, speaking a dead language might exacerbate the consequences of culture shock. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of knowing a dominant language relate to this reality that the demerits of native language pertain to the power of expression. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of practical experiences is correlated negatively with mingling with people. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of broadening our horizons.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of language learning far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of native language prove the significance of widely used around the world, but also pinpoint career implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-26 | msgnaneswaran | 11 | view |
| 2019-04-06 | mohab.elhaddad | 85 | view |
| 2019-04-02 | foadihasan | 77 | view |
| 2019-04-01 | Fernanda Giorge | 55 | view |
| 2019-02-17 | Mahdi_Farhani | 80 | view |
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon? 88
- Whether the design of the building will have a positive or negative impact on people's life and work? 77
- Whether the design of the building will have a positive or negative impact on people's life and work? 77
- “More information available online so library books are useless.” Agree or disagree with the statement? 11
- Government should reduce their investment in arts, music and painting. Agree or disagree? 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1510.0 1207.87684729 125% => OK
No of words: 263.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.74144486692 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31126972949 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 139.433497537 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.661596958175 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 379.143842365 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.332241249 50.4703680194 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.833333333 104.977214359 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9166666667 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41666666667 7.25397266985 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205540065764 0.242375264174 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0648848267909 0.0925447433944 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0558946310445 0.071462118173 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113977282623 0.151781067708 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0673181478316 0.0609392437508 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.01 11.5310837438 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.8 8.32886699507 130% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 55.0591133005 185% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.