Whether experimental learning can work well in formal education, agree or disagree?
Or
Experience is a more effective way to teach, compared to books? Agree or disagree.
Recently, the phenomenon of practical experience and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that in comparison to formal education, practical could bring many benefits for both society and educational system, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by substantial numbers of individuals. I profoundly inclined to believe that just using books could not prepared students, and this essay will examine this view before concluding.
From the educational standpoint, formal teaching can provide a society with some noticeable positive impacts, which are rooted in the fact that learning methods, as well as educational perspective, are extremely bound up. From my own experience when I was a college student, I performed an academic survey about education methods which revealed that using books and documents were still popular among authorities. Thus, the beneficial ramification of both scientific evidence and excellent books apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, learning new skills just based on formal and theoretical education method might increase detrimental effects of non-experienced educated people. Moreover, fundamental aspects of experimental education related to this fact that practical experiments could prepare graduates with so many useful knowledge which could not be achieved by just theoretical learning. According to an academic research conducted by Tehran University, those of students with having at least 30% practical courses are well-educated than their counterparts. Not to mention that these experience help students to get better and more reliable career in the future due to industry knowledge they acquired.
To recapitulate, I pen down saying that although some opponents tend to believe that formal education with some books and academic resources is enough for students to be prepared, I strongly tend to believe that practical education has many advantages which outweigh its disadvantages.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-21 | larkyfan | 85 | view |
| 2019-11-10 | priyankavs23 | 80 | view |
| 2019-11-10 | priyankavs23 | 80 | view |
| 2019-04-23 | AkashPTEnikalo | 88 | view |
| 2019-03-05 | santo | 85 | view |
- Company Top Level Authorities should or should not take employees suggestions or ideas to make any decisions. Discuss both views. 88
- It is foolish idea to get married before finishing the study and settling down. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 88
- Effective learning requires time, comfort and peace, so it is impossible to combine study and employment. Study and employment distract one from another. To what extent do you think the statements are realistic? Support your opinion with examples. 77
- Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are a role model for youngsters. Do you support it or not? 88
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon? 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 422, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'prepare'
Suggestion: prepare
...believe that just using books could not prepared students, and this essay will examine t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 310, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun knowledge seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much useful knowledge', 'a good deal of useful knowledge'.
Suggestion: much useful knowledge; a good deal of useful knowledge
...riments could prepare graduates with so many useful knowledge which could not be achieved by just the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, if, moreover, so, still, thus, well, at least, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 5.94088669951 236% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1720.0 1207.87684729 142% => OK
No of words: 296.0 242.827586207 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.81081081081 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0779085136 2.71678728327 113% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 139.433497537 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611486486486 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 539.1 379.143842365 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.3847633013 50.4703680194 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 156.363636364 104.977214359 149% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.9090909091 20.9669160288 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.27272727273 7.25397266985 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108441540602 0.242375264174 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0424474602112 0.0925447433944 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0322419099635 0.071462118173 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0659821454267 0.151781067708 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0306697967457 0.0609392437508 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.4 12.6369458128 154% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 53.1260098522 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.9458128079 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.71 11.5310837438 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.42 8.32886699507 125% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 55.0591133005 187% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.