some people think that cars should be banned from large citie. to what extend do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

Essay topics:

some people think that cars should be banned from large citie. to what extend do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

Recently, the phenomenon of using private cars and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of private vehicle is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that banning the cars can be a plus, but there would be a more effective solution. I will analyze that throughout this essay.

From the environmental standpoint, a prohibition on using private cars can provide a society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that less air pollution as well as less traffic, are inextricably bound up. According to my personal experience, when I was a university student, I perform an academic experiment which discovered that a significant number of fossil-fuel cars have a detrimental effect on the environment. Thus, the beneficial consequences of banning the cars and limitation on using the private vehicles apparently can be seen.

In the realm of legislation, the restriction law about banning cars might exacerbate the consequences of people's welfare. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of prohibition related to this reality the demerits of limitation on using the cars pertain to more difficulties in transportation. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertook by a prestigious university asserted the downsides of restriction regulation about transformation is correlated negatively with citizen's satisfaction. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of electronic cars.

To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of using eco-friendly cars far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of environmental respect proves the significance of widely around the world, but also pinpoint transportation degradation implications.

Votes
Average: 8.5 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-02-21 josethtang 72 view
2018-10-19 goli.mohsen 88 view
2018-01-02 maryam2 85 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user maryam2 :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 5.75862068966 330% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1635.0 1207.87684729 135% => OK
No of words: 287.0 242.827586207 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.6968641115 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.44668524595 2.71678728327 127% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 139.433497537 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606271777003 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 522.9 379.143842365 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 6.0 1.56157635468 384% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.4547311659 50.4703680194 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.769230769 104.977214359 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0769230769 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.92307692308 7.25397266985 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168654202436 0.242375264174 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0555279827362 0.0925447433944 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.043116866965 0.071462118173 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0916681837496 0.151781067708 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.029100332013 0.0609392437508 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.78 11.5310837438 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.61 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 55.0591133005 194% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.