People should take time to relax with hobbies or physical activities that very different from what they do at work.
Due to the high speed of lifestyle today, people’s jobs come with relative more pressure and less leisure time than in the past. It is necessary and rewarding to take time to relax under such a stressful circumstance. Personally, having one or two hobbies that different from their jobs is a very advisable way.
First of all, people can better refresh themselves by doing something different. They can change their minds by jumping out of the tedium and boring staff they have to do in daily life. According to the recent science report, people tend to come up with new ideas and thoughts after a pause when they are in a dilemma. Artists may meet with exiting inspirations, managers may figure out suitable plans and scientists may make out unparalleled solutions after they put their working things aside. Thus, having hobbies in the different field is a benefit for their work.
Secondly, people can have a wider horizon if they have hobbies in broad scale. One person would only have friends who also major in science if he or she focuses on a single science field. By contrast, people will make numerous friends via contacting a lot of people in a different situation. Also, a wonderful and colourful life needs not only practical scientific theories but also romantic literary imagination. By learning from their friends, people can analyze problems in a more objective way, which can definitely improve themselves mentally. So it is important and imperative for people to have at least one hobbits out of their familiar major.
Finally, various hobbies and physical activities may bring people more opportunities job wise. Everyone can be a master in any field if they are willing to take time. I deeply believe people can do their hobbies well thanks to the strong interest. That is to say, people can change their working filed afterwards if they do not enjoy it anymore. Developing a hobbit into a career is one of the luckiest things in the world. So the time people spent on their hobbies will never a waste.
In conclusion, through doing hobbits different from work, people can gain noble ideas, broaden the horizon and even own more job selections. We should actually cultivate some hobbies and physically activities intentionally.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-08-14 | saeedbadri | 73 | view |
- the pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 70
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world Do you think this is a positive or negative development 84
- The bar chart below gives information about the trends in landline telephone ownership in different countries 71
- Some people believe that smartphones are destroying social interaction today To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- the diagrams show the differences in the consumption of water for agricultural industrial and household sectors in those six areas Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, well, at least, in conclusion, first of all, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1888.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 378.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99470899471 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40933352052 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65918683066 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566137566138 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 587.7 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.5262459278 48.9658058833 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 85.8181818182 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1818181818 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.04545454545 5.45110844103 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.374907512904 0.236089414692 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106118231383 0.076458572812 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0547679867709 0.0737576698707 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216464944209 0.150856017488 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0557627739305 0.0645574589148 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 11.7677419355 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.