Is that law can change the human behaviour?
The issue that law can alter the human behaviour was debatable, has become more controversial. The substantial influence of law to modify the human nature has evoked the controversy over the potential impact of this trend in recent years. From my perspective, I totally endorse that statement that rules and regulations have significant influential implications in order to modify the human behaviour. The essay will further elaborate the reasons and explanations for supporting the notion and thus deduce the dialectic conclusion.
At the outset, myriad conspicuous reasons can be brought up justify that legislation are the fundamental element to build a violence free society where vulnerable and law abiding citizens are protected under the judicial system. The preponderant explanation lies in the fact that the sense of punishment and hefty fines always deter the individuals to break the law. For instance, smuggling illegal drugs can lead criminals toward capital punishment.
Another key justification upholding the notion is that law is crucial to bring harmony and peace in society. The regulations and their implementation by law enforcement force the offenders not commit the offence. Like, traffic laws are necessary to run the smooth traffic on road, not following the laws can cause devastating consequences.
Precisely analysing the facts, I would like to recapitulate that law definitely mould the human behaviour and pivotal for the sake of better society.
- Talk about the pros/cons of this era as is full of daily invention. Any recent invention that you think proved beneficial or detrimental to society. 77
- Problems and solution of climate cahnge 11
- Xenophobia has accelerated rapidly in the western countries. According to you, what are the reasons, effects and what solutions can be proposed by governments and individuals. 88
- Age discrimination against elderly workers should be illegal. 77
- computer and its advantages 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... thus deduce the dialectic conclusion. At the outset, myriad conspicuous reason...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d criminals toward capital punishment. Another key justification upholding the ...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ws can cause devastating consequences. Precisely analysing the facts, I would l...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, thus, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 20.9802955665 57% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 31.9359605911 75% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1260.0 1207.87684729 104% => OK
No of words: 227.0 242.827586207 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55066079295 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0478724196 2.71678728327 112% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 139.433497537 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.651982378855 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 397.8 379.143842365 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.9580020201 50.4703680194 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.545454545 104.977214359 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6363636364 20.9669160288 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.36363636364 7.25397266985 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.393589217445 0.242375264174 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132302396119 0.0925447433944 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0987851931233 0.071462118173 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215406440524 0.151781067708 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0582881811154 0.0609392437508 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 11.5310837438 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.19 8.32886699507 122% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 55.0591133005 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.