The best test of an argument is the argument's ability to convince someone with an opposing viewpoint.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Is there always a way that someone will be convinced by your viewpoint? Will he/she ever be able to completely accept it since there is always an idea in their head what should be? I don’t think so. Convincing someone that what you are saying is true is an onerous task and many people fail to prove their point. It requires compelling facts and figure to manipulate someone’s mind and make them think the way you do. This could be understood by the way that global scientists and film directors who changed the way one perceives something.
Taking an example of a scientist, who is critiqued by his own fraternity to the brink that drives him away from something he actually believed him just because his hypothesis was not potent to incorporate the factual orthodoxy. Like Edison, who despite countless failed attempts and constant harangue of people did not lose hope, stood strong and eventually through his persistence he was able to achieve what seemed insurmountable.
Film directors and moviemakers are always considered the pioneers of developing new ideas by portraying them through their movies. The Pakistani director, Sharmeen Obaid Chinoy was so adamant to tell the stories of women who became the victims of acid attacks in Pakistan, that despite the strong opposition powerful political leaders and incessant bickering and polemics, made the movie and showcased it to the world. It was the resilience of her idea and her conviction to actually create awareness of what happened and how repugnant it was, which led her to win accolades for her endeavor in the show business.
To conclude, I truly believe a person’s mind cannot be diverted from their opinion, unless the other viewpoint is extremely very cogent and compels the detractor, through facts that could be proven and leading them to change their perception.
- The following appeared as part of a business plan developed by the manager of the Rialto Movie Theater."Despite its downtown location, the Rialto Movie Theater, a local institution for five decades, must make big changes or close its doors forever. It sho 83
- Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 50
- It is more harmful to compromise one's own beliefs than to adhere to them.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting 54
- The following recommendation was made by the president and administrative staff of Grove College, a private institution, to the college's governing committee."We recommend that Grove College preserve its century-old tradition of all-female education rathe 51
- The following argument was made in a newspaper editorial:“The autonomy of any country is based on the strength of its borders; if the number of illegal immigrants entering a country cannot be checked, both its economy and national identity are endangere 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 90, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[3]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
...ced by your viewpoint? Will he/she ever be able to completely accept it since ther...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, so, by the way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 58.6224719101 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1555.0 2235.4752809 70% => OK
No of words: 305.0 442.535393258 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09836065574 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76936440346 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.603278688525 0.4932671777 122% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 704.065955056 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.9920366143 60.3974514979 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.583333333 118.986275619 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4166666667 23.4991977007 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.21951772744 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113355457653 0.243740707755 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0479746328374 0.0831039109588 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0517463104083 0.0758088955206 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0577364522126 0.150359130593 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0545331508455 0.0667264976115 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 100.480337079 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.