Environmental pollution is too alarming to be managed by individuals. Real change can be made at the government level. To what extent do you agree or disagree.
Nowadays, the environmental pollution has become a long-running dispute among the public all over the world, which leads to a moot question “who is the responsible for this crisis the government or individuals?”. It is a widely held view that the function of the government to diminish the pollution is highly beneficial, whereas I tend to believe that one must weigh up carefully the pros and cons of this issue.
To begin with, it is a common belief that the government plays a vital role in the world of cut-troat competition to address the polution problem. To put into consideration, I express some reasons why I support this idea. First and foremost is that the eco-friendly fuels must be replaced detrimental fossil fuels. Secondly, it can be argued that the government is incharge of encourage people to leave their defective cars and use the comprehensive transport system. In addition to this information, it should be mentioned that beneficial loans must be offered to factories to relocate to less beautiful areas.
How ever, there is no doubt that the environment contaminent provides people with various negative points. It should be taken into account that it is not rational to lay the blame for environmental polution on just the government. Moreover, it is quite clear that individuals are responsible to contribute to eliminate this crisis by using poblic transport system instead of private car as well to participate in educational session to raise their poblic awareness about damaging concequence of environmental polution.
To recapitulate, I entirely agree the the responsibility of the government to decrease environmental polutuion must be taken into consideration. However, as every garden may have some weeds, the local authorities are recommended to enforce stricter legislation, and individuals are hoped to heighten their intellect.
- Right amount of motivation and practice can train better than classroom training. What is your opinion? Provide relevant examples. 11
- Mass media like TV, newspaper and radio influence people, particularly young generation. Do you think it works as a pivot to shape the society? What is your opinion? 33
- In a war of ideas, it is people who get killed”. Does a common man suffer from a group’s ideology? Express your opinion, and support the same with reasons and examples. 85
- Government should reduce their investment in arts, music and painting. Agree or disagree? 11
- Are the cars damaging the environment? Should the number of cars be restricted to one for one family? Give your views and support your views with appropriate examples. 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 50, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... the environmental pollution has become a long-running dispute among the public all over the w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: HOW_EVER[1]
Message: Did you mean 'however'?
Suggestion: However
...o relocate to less beautiful areas. How ever, there is no doubt that the environment...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 35, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...n. To recapitulate, I entirely agree the the responsibility of the government to dec...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 35, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...n. To recapitulate, I entirely agree the the responsibility of the government to dec...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, whereas, in addition, no doubt, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.5418719212 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 20.9802955665 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 5.75862068966 365% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1591.0 1207.87684729 132% => OK
No of words: 295.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39322033898 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28258486582 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 139.433497537 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 379.143842365 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.6157635468 173% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.6450939329 50.4703680194 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.583333333 104.977214359 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5833333333 20.9669160288 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.41666666667 7.25397266985 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166863661737 0.242375264174 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0605583986331 0.0925447433944 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0529716604825 0.071462118173 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0967022479176 0.151781067708 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0314522738583 0.0609392437508 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 12.6369458128 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 53.1260098522 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 11.5310837438 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.32886699507 115% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 55.0591133005 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 77.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.