variety of qualified workers from the year 1995 to 2020
The given table indicates the variety of qualified workers in millions from the year 1995 to 2020. General speaking, the forcasting of low qualified employees by the year 2020 has the most significant rate.
As the table shows, The low qualification level has a gradual increase while the no qualification rate of employees fall down sharply. Regarding to the table information, the no qualification rate varied from 6 millions to 2.5 millions. Besides the low qualification level rise from 10.5 to 13.5.
The given information about degree or postgraduate qualification rate, claimed that there has been a sharp rise in number from 5 million to about 9.5 and it contains a lot of changes. In contrast, intermediate qualification number has small changes. Also, between 2005 and 2010 it remains steady.
To conclude, based on The data, provided by the table The number of qualified workers has a significant growth in general between 1995 and 2020.
- As cities expanding, some people claim governments should look forward to creating better networks of public transportation available for everyone rather than building more roads for vehicle owning population. What’s your opinion? Give some examples or 84
- Law can change human behavior. Do you agree or not? 85
- Do you support dangerous activities like extreme skiing? what are the reasons for that? 77
- Many people believe that they should spend their money to enjoy life at present Others however think that they should save it for the future Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- If you want to study a particular area of climate change which area will you choose 57
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, regarding, so, while, in contrast, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 805.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 155.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1935483871 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02926413623 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 106.607317073 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.541935483871 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 232.2 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 57.1378541337 43.030603864 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.625 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.375 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325067732585 0.215688989381 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.161243200181 0.103423049105 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.218687734064 0.0843802449381 259% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236564565121 0.15604864568 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.227886621636 0.0819641961636 278% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.