The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in Newport city centre from 2003-2012
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The presented line graph illustrates data on crime in three various places in Newport city centre between 2003 and 2012.
As can be seen from the line graph, the number of robbery was the least over the period of 9 years. With regard to robbery, starting at about 750 cases in 2003, the incidence of robbery fluctuated from 2003 to 2007 and touched the lowest point at 500 incidences in 2008. After that, there was a fluctuation slightly around 750 cases in 2012.
When it comes to burglary, beginning at approximately 3500 in 2003, the amount of burglary touched the highest point almost 3800 in the next year. Thenceforth, there was a sudden decrease to 1500 in 2008. However, it slightly climbed around 1500 in 2009 and then remained stable approximately 1500 in four years later.
With respect to car theft, with a starting point of 2900 in 2003, the number of car theft remained the same starting 2003 to 2005. There was a reduction about 2000 in 2006 and then a slight fluctuation over the next six years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-10 | Abhishek Neupane | 56 | view |
| 2020-10-27 | Negin hadisadegh | 78 | view |
| 2020-05-21 | gisellanathania | view | |
| 2018-03-13 | To Vien | 82 | view |
- It is more important for school children to learn about local history than world history. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 73
- It is better for students at university to live far away from home than to live at home with their parents. What are the advantages and disadvantages of living far from home? 61
- It is more important for school children to learn about local history than world history. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 73
- The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in Newport city centre from 2003 2012 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 82
- The line chart shows the total spending of five different categories, in percentage, in a European country from 1960 to 2000 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 320, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...approximately 1500 in four years later. With respect to car theft, with a starti...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, then, with regard to, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 852.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75977653631 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45336008107 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.553072625698 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 224.1 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.5805646318 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.6666666667 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8888888889 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88888888889 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10179522943 0.215688989381 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0423357945222 0.103423049105 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0677150791648 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0818893403527 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0836183878426 0.0819641961636 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.