Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Some countries tend to concentrate on finding solutions for the current problems it faces, while others create strategies for the upcoming expected issues rather than focusing their full attention on today’s concerns. I totally believe that advantages of paying attention to today’s problem outweigh the cons.
First, by looking persistently for solutions and keys to overcome the obstacles its countries are going through, governments are in fact check the growth of many problems which may be built upon these issues. For example, when government X provided the problem of water resources shortage, it had definitely studied the problem of growing demands on those sources and the pollution they face. Hence, government X decided to control today’s scenarios that can some day impact the surging of the future issue of having a shortage in water.
Additionally, it is better for governments to solve real problems. In other words, future issues are a matter of anticipation rather than certainty. While current problems are weighted and can be seen thoroughly, one cannot be so sure whether thinking of the upcoming problems is actually worth it since it is based on assumptions.
Some may argue that is it more thorough to see the whole picture of the predicted problem because it is too late to think of perfect solutions for today’s. In the other hand, time indeed does pass very quickly which may make us lose the control over both today’s and tomorrow’s issues when only focusing on the current problems, but this would never be the outcome when government takes both today’s and future’s problems as one chain and correlates them together, since no one national problem can arise without having introductory cases.
To sum up, I believe that today’s problems are the flame to those anticipated to happen next, at least on a national basis. So, focusing official’s energy on the current problems will for sure prevent them from creating other problem. This is better than wasting time and resources on assumptions base on real-time issues that can be solved instead.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-19 | jason123 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | Himanshu Sharma | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-26 | tg763622253 | 58 | view |
| 2019-11-27 | mohan41 | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-26 | louisetse | 66 | view |
- "Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increasingly more time to covering national news and less time to covering weather and local news. During the same time period, most of the complaints we received from viewers were concerned wit 50
- "The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company. "According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in a 37
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain y 50
- Prompt: “’The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition.’ Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'argues'.
Suggestion: argues
... it is based on assumptions. Some may argue that is it more thorough to see the who...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, hence, look, may, so, while, at least, for example, in fact, in other words, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1791.0 2235.4752809 80% => OK
No of words: 339.0 442.535393258 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28318584071 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91885483407 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 215.323595506 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560471976401 0.4932671777 114% => OK
syllable_count: 542.7 704.065955056 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 83.487872485 60.3974514979 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.769230769 118.986275619 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0769230769 23.4991977007 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.30769230769 5.21951772744 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216734385568 0.243740707755 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.089029568393 0.0831039109588 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0205252915834 0.0758088955206 27% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13867648309 0.150359130593 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0159702001203 0.0667264976115 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 14.1392134831 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.1639044944 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 100.480337079 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.