Do you prefer to take a course taught by a professor with whom you have not had classes before or a course taught by a professor whose class you have taken before?
Give specific examples and details to support your answer.
As an inseparable part of each glorious civilizations, education is inextricably intertwined with people's lives. Since all aspects of life are susceptible to the influence of education, individuals must care about this crucial facet of their lives. While nowadays some people subscribe to the view that having courses with professors whom they have had classes before is the most significant pillar of success in education, others look at this concept through a different lens. Be that as it may, many remain neutral and adamantly claim that a myriad of elements should be taken into consideration to prove which belief is closer to reality. To my way of thinking, the more students have classes with unfamiliar professors, the more prosperously they live. So I can say that this statement is the one I can be in agreement with. The following paragraphs will aptly substantiate my conspicuous viewpoints.
This argument is supported by the persuasively stated evidence not just opinion that attending to the classes of various professors is the best policy for achieving zenith of success in education. As a matter of fact, being in the same professor's different classes makes you one-dimensional person. To be more specific, different professors have different fields of specialty, taking courses with unfamiliar professors gives you more chances to get acquainted with a wide assortment of subject matters. As a case in point, I vividly remember, when I was attending the University of Tehran, despite my friends, taking courses with unfamiliar professors is my first priority. All my friends thought it was a ridiculous approach, owing to the fact that they opted for same professors for their various classes, because in this case, they were familiar with his methodology in training. Notwithstanding, I strongly kept up with my opinion, and after graduation, they were really jealous of me, due to the fact that I decisively could think differently. In other words, attending in classes with different professors allowed me to gain a variegated stream of perspectives in order to broaden my horizons. Therefore, my personal experience competently corroborates the fact that taking different classes with various professors obviously provides benefit for students, albeit difficult at times.
By the same token, one should regard another subtle point meticulously that in addition to expanding the breadth of knowledge, people can have more fortune to disclosure their great capabilities and strengthens in a profusion of subjects to more tutors by attending classes with different professors, which fosters the extension of job opportunities is its crowning achievement. In fact, in this day and age most companies with various fields of specialty are in close connection with some university’s professors, so attending classes with diverse professors could be a promising step for accessing to a spread-spectrum of job situations. For example, let's go back ten years ago, when my brother graduated from the University of Tehran, after graduation he went to visit some of his professors and surprisingly they proposed him different job opportunities, and he was so excited, since he never thought he could find a decent job in this critical situation of unemployment in the country. Hence, this concrete experience shed some light on the viewpoint that taking courses with unfamiliar professors, not only gives you a panoramic insight into your specialty fields but also gives you more job opportunities in the near future.
By and large, according to the above-mentioned reasons, I vehemently agree with this standpoint that attending classes with different professors is the best option. Now the inevitable question is why most of the students (most students) prefer taking courses taught by familiar professors yet.
- TPO-40 - Integrated Writing Task Many scientists believe it would be possible to maintain a permanent human presence on Mars or the Moon. On the other hand, conditions on Venus are so extreme and inhospitable that maintaining a human presence there would 75
- TPO-03 - Integrated Writing Task Rembrandt is the most famous of the seventeenth-century Dutch painters. However, there are doubts whether some paintings attributed to Rembrandt were actually painted by him. One such painting is known as attributed to Rem 73
- Do you prefer to take a course taught by a professor with whom you have not had classes before or a course taught by a professor whose class you have taken before?Give specific examples and details to support your answer. 73
- People in communities can make decisions that protect and improve the natural environment. Which one of the following three actions is most useful for people to do if they want to help the environment in their local community? Explain why? Increase access 90
- Do you prefer to take a course taught by a professor with whom you have not had classes before or a course taught by a professor whose class you have taken before Give specific examples and details to support your answer 87
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, look, may, really, so, then, therefore, while, for example, in addition, in fact, as a matter of fact, by and large, in other words, by the same token
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 62.0 43.0788530466 144% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 99.0 52.1666666667 190% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.0752688172 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3238.0 1977.66487455 164% => OK
No of words: 600.0 407.700716846 147% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39666666667 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.94923200384 4.48103885553 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14493596473 2.67179642975 118% => OK
Unique words: 301.0 212.727598566 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501666666667 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 994.5 618.680645161 161% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 10.0 3.51792114695 284% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 13.0 4.94265232975 263% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 77.9791820582 48.9658058833 159% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.19047619 100.406767564 154% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5714285714 20.6045352989 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.52380952381 5.45110844103 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296069867718 0.236089414692 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0913860052023 0.076458572812 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0748691077999 0.0737576698707 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187404243045 0.150856017488 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0304824158079 0.0645574589148 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 11.7677419355 156% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 58.1214874552 60% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.1575268817 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 10.9000537634 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 158.0 86.8835125448 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 10.002688172 155% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.247311828 156% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.