do you think the consumer should avoid over packed products or it is the responsibility of the producer to avoid extra packaging of products?give your views or any relevant example.
Recently, the phenomenon of packing product and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that overpacking is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that product can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the consumer standpoint, the producer can provide the society with noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that waste product, as well as eco-friendly product, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which deciphered plastic bags. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both green product and sustainable bags can be seen.
Within the realm of contamination, managing product might increase the consequences of multilayer bags. Moreover, fundamental aspects of damaging environment relate to this reality that the demerits of luxury package pertain to the consumer attraction. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertook by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of recycling product is correlated negatively with recyclable cover. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of litter.
To conclude, while three are several compelling arguments of both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of protecting product far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of pre-packaged items prove the significance of non-disposal plastic cup, but also pinpoints of extra packaging implications.
- the environmental we live in is in danger.what are the underlying causes?who is responsible to combat this? 11
- do you support dangerous activities like extreme skiing, skydiving, bungee jumping or not? what is the reason for that? 11
- in many countries, children are engaged in different kinds of paid work. some people regard this as completely wrong. others consider it as a valuable work experience, important for learning and taking responsibility.what is your opinion? 85
- Mass media 80
- in a war of ideas, it is people who get killed. does a common man suffer from a groups ideology?express your opinion, and support the same with reasons and examples. 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1383.0 1207.87684729 114% => OK
No of words: 240.0 242.827586207 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.7625 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29898711307 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.666666666667 0.580463131201 115% => OK
syllable_count: 433.8 379.143842365 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0862784781 50.4703680194 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.25 104.977214359 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.9669160288 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41666666667 7.25397266985 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199469124172 0.242375264174 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0612032350185 0.0925447433944 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0427854732346 0.071462118173 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107885266833 0.151781067708 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0122159674545 0.0609392437508 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 12.6369458128 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 11.5310837438 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.08 8.32886699507 133% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 55.0591133005 178% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.