In the modern world it is possible to shop, work and communicate with people via internet and live without any face-to-face contact with others. Is it a positive or negative development in your opinion? To what extent do you support this development?
In past time when people used to deliver their message without internet and purchase of any items by going to shop have been replaced by online shopping of any items. Some people believe that online shopping via internet is very sophisticated and beneficial and other people argue that online shopping has degraded the quality of items. In this essay I shall discuss both views by analyzing the this argument and explore the logical conclusion.
To start with, there are myriad and conspicuous benefits for those who doesn't have free time for shopping. One of them is ordering an item from office and get their parcel by one click to save precious time. Some of people believe that varieties of product has been increased recently after era of online shopping. The range of products and estimated delivery of time is emblazoned on shopping portal to give all benefits during online surfing.
On contrary, other people argue and say that online shopping is decreasing employment in city and some extent they are good at their part. They argue that online shopping doesn't provide any physical outlook for trial to validate the product. In addition, online shopping provide frustration to buyer by delay and faulty delivery.
In recapitulate while there are strong ubiquitous and epitome views, in personal view I believe to the advantages outweigh the disadvantages. I would recommend any matter of dis-obliterate must be taken with rigorously and penalized according to offense.
- Some people believe law changes human behavior. Do you agree/disagree? 77
- Employee who are overqualified for which employer might not be happy and how he can be given good position in organization by not letting him quit. 77
- Does e-learning have a prosperous future? Do you agree or disagree? 75
- Should public schools server healthy locally grown foods to children 73
- With increase population and even growing urban centers many countries are losing their natural beauty spots What benefits are there to protect places of natural beauty How can this be solved 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 4, Rule ID: PAST_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'pastime'?
Suggestion: pastime
In past time when people used to deliver their messa...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 392, Rule ID: DT_DT[2]
Message: Maybe you need to remove the second determiner so that only 'the' or 'this' is left.
Suggestion: the; this
...I shall discuss both views by analyzing the this argument and explore the logical conclu...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 73, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... and conspicuous benefits for those who doesnt have free time for shopping. One of the...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 209, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'Some of', you should use 'the' ('Some of the people') or simply say ''Some people''.
Suggestion: Some of the people; Some people
...cel by one click to save precious time. Some of people believe that varieties of product has b...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 172, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...r part. They argue that online shopping doesnt provide any physical outlook for trial ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, so, while, in addition, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1240.0 1207.87684729 103% => OK
No of words: 241.0 242.827586207 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14522821577 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63042395447 2.71678728327 97% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 139.433497537 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580912863071 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 406.8 379.143842365 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.4245889293 50.4703680194 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 103.333333333 104.977214359 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0833333333 20.9669160288 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.58333333333 7.25397266985 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141271896589 0.242375264174 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0510227208382 0.0925447433944 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0403904109598 0.071462118173 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.083098957125 0.151781067708 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0488381085329 0.0609392437508 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 12.6369458128 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 11.5310837438 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 55.0591133005 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.