TPO-43 - Independent Writing Task Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?-Interrupt and correct the mistake right away-Wa
Speaking and presenting in public or meetings poses one of the most stressfull activity which one could experince in his/her life. There for It is natural no have some mistake or saying something incorrects. In this event, some try to intrrupt the presentation and notice the mistakes while others say nothing at all. There are a thirds group that wait until meeting finished and then talk to speaker privately. I personally agree with the last peoples and elaborate on my reasons as follow.
First, this is an unpolite and non-professional behaviour to cut the talking of the appointment speaker. What's more, this immediate response might distrcat his and other audience's concentration from remaining of the topic.
Second, it is possible that one have not recognise that this is a wrong statement and a type of misunderstading ocuured for him. This point possibly mislead him and affect on his furture decision making. Take an example that this mistake was being related to a date or a financial number. Beforementiond persond might take some action wrong ro very late that could not be pleasure for anyone.
In sum, since intrrupting the speaking is an unpolite and distracting manner and could mislead the persons I strongly disagree with the first two ideas.
- Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?-Interrupt and correct the mistake right away-Wa 76
- TPO 50 integrated 3
- TPO-48 - Integrated Writing Task 76
- TPO 48- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Because modern life is very complex, it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize. 83
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.Discuss both these views and gi 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 482, Rule ID: AS_FOLLOW[1]
Message: Did you mean 'as follows'?
Suggestion: as follows
...ast peoples and elaborate on my reasons as follow. First, this is an unpolite and non-pr...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 105, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...the talking of the appointment speaker. Whats more, this immediate response might dis...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 170, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'audiences'' or 'audience's'?
Suggestion: audiences'; audience's
...e response might distrcat his and other audiences concentration from remaining of the top...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 42, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'recognised'.
Suggestion: recognised
...econd, it is possible that one have not recognise that this is a wrong statement and a ty...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 165, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...im. This point possibly mislead him and affect on his furture decision making. Take an ex...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, then, third, while, talking of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 43.0788530466 51% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 52.1666666667 38% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1062.0 1977.66487455 54% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 209.0 407.700716846 51% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08133971292 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 4.48103885553 85% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83076532016 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 212.727598566 65% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.66028708134 0.524837075471 126% => OK
syllable_count: 330.3 618.680645161 53% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6003584229 58% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.4181494192 48.9658058833 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 88.5 100.406767564 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4166666667 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.41666666667 5.45110844103 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 11.8709677419 8% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0638439612537 0.236089414692 27% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0252477357906 0.076458572812 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0316600129541 0.0737576698707 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0317318492506 0.150856017488 21% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0483695002578 0.0645574589148 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 86.8835125448 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.