Some people think that environmental problems should be solved on a global scale while, other believe that it is better to deal with the nationality. Discuss both views and give your opinion
With the rise in modernization, a man has transformed his life tremendously. He has progressed from walking barefooted in the jungles to take first step on the moon. Nevertheless, there are some issues which remains irreuocable and as complex as ever. For instance, the given topic asserts that should the environmental obstacles will be solved on global level or nationality? Through this essay, I shall explore the dimensions of this topic with illustration and examples and shape up my opinion by the end
On one side, there is a group of people who reckon that it is necessary to solve the obstacles related to environment globally. They strengthen their view point by claiming that in the present scenerio, it is irrefutable that problems related to environment is the "Burning questions of the day." A good illustration of this is obstacle related to the pollution especially, "Radiactive pollution" which is increasing day by day. It may be due to the war that occur most of the time between different countries. A recent survey published in Hindustan times related to war between Pakistan and India would be the best epitome of this. Therefore, it is necessary to eradicate this problem but, it is only possible with the cooperation of other countries.
Contrary to this, there is an opposing group of people who believe that it is the duty of particular nation to solve the problem of environment. To make their view point convincing they claim that problem such as air pollution it can be controlled by nation itself. So, it is the duty of the government to "Take bull on their horns" and find a fruitful solution because, problem related to the air pollution is not considered in foreign countries like United States of America. It seems that in India only few areas were polluted. Therefore, it is the responsibility of the governance to implement rules and regulations to control such environmental issues on nation scale.
To sum up, weighing both the options, I take this ground that an effective clap require both use of hands. Nodoubt, there are some issues which are solved with the assistance of other countries but, some other environmenral problems especially, air pollution is only overcome if government of that nation introduce rules to mend environmental issues.
- These days many young people leave school with a negative attitude towards learning Why is this happening What can be done to help young people to leave school with more positive attitude 69
- Some people think that it is more beneficial to play sports that are played in teams e.g football. However, some people think that it is more beneficial to play individual sports e.g tennis and swimming. Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Every country has poor people and different ways to deal with them. What are some of the reasons for poverty? What can we do to help the poor? Give reasons and examples of your own experience. 67
- In many countries the proportion of older people is steadily increasing. Some think this is good. While other believe this is a problem for a country. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
- The chart give information about rates of smoking in men and women from year 1960 to 2000. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 279, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ially, air pollution is only overcome if government of that nation introduce rule...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, for instance, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1947.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 380.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12368421053 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10677371823 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515789473684 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 615.6 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.1185441961 49.4020404114 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.6875 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22131935321 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0684426671076 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0566294043829 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135995065912 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.032958533348 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.