How widely do you think the problem spreads that people spend too much time on work than their personal life and experience time shortage What problems will it cause?
Recently the phenomenon of spending too much time at work and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that increase in work hours can be beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both rewarding and positive. However, I profoundly inclined to believe that people should adjust a balance between personal and professional life, and this essay will look at both sides of this view before reaching the conclusion.
From a social standpoint, hardworking could bring many benefits to both society and individuals at the same time. Firstly, it could lead to running projects more efficiently and as a consequence of that, it could lead to more profit for the firm. Secondly, authorities encourage people to work more than a normal rate, even after work hours. Finally, according to an academic research conducted by the economic institute, spending too much time on professions could bring a high level of satisfaction for employers.
On the other hand, every person should provide a comfortable atmosphere for his or her family and it could not be achieved by just spending time on work. Moreover, work pressure could bring much illness to workers such as heart disease, mental or physical disoriented. Due to an academic survey presented by Tehran University, most of the heart attack in a workplace is happening after work hours. Hence, staying late at work not only could bring problems for the individual, but it might lead to family problems which finally could bring much social discrimination.
To conclude, I pen down saying that although some people tend to believe that hardworking and spending too much time on work is an essential part of work in this hectic lifestyle, I highly tend to believe that people should provide healthy conditions between work and personal life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-13 | fereshteh.r | 88 | view |
| 2022-11-13 | fereshteh.r | 85 | view |
| 2019-10-04 | NataliaTraeger | 83 | view |
| 2018-05-21 | Manisha Verma | 79 | view |
| 2018-05-13 | payamesp2 | 77 | view |
- Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are a role model for youngsters. Do you support it or not? 88
- “More information available online so library books are useless.” Agree or disagree with the statement? 11
- Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are a role model for youngsters. Do you support it or not? 11
- Some people believe law changes human behavior. Do you agree/disagree? 80
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon? 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ould bring much social discrimination. To conclude, I pen down saying that alth...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, hence, however, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.5418719212 47% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 6.10837438424 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1539.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 297.0 242.827586207 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18181818182 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80848449649 2.71678728327 103% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 139.433497537 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558922558923 0.580463131201 96% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 379.143842365 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.0235204321 50.4703680194 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.25 104.977214359 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.75 20.9669160288 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.25397266985 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253693177981 0.242375264174 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0926156451258 0.0925447433944 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0619174776137 0.071462118173 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162464299451 0.151781067708 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0306400798871 0.0609392437508 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 12.6369458128 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.1260098522 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 11.5310837438 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 55.0591133005 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.