Recently, the phenomenon of spending too much time on work than personal life has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the advantage of work-life balance is highly beneficial, the disadvantage of such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I highly believe that working less and having more time for life can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, spending too much time on work rather than personal time can provide societies with noticeable effects that are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as advantages of fewer financial problems in the individual's life, are crucial. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the relationship between earning higher salaries and daily working hours. Thus, the beneficial ramifications of job satisfaction by spending too much time at work are visible.
From a scientific point of view, facing time shortage problems caused by working over-timely can provide the community with negative impacts that are related to the reality that the demerits of family-related issues are remarkable. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university described the role of emotional divorce effects on personal lives. Hence, the predicted outcomes of spreading the problem of devoting life to work are noticeable.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of spending time with family rather than working hardly far outweigh the drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of experiencing a happy life than earning a higher income prove the significance of a less problematic lifestyle, but also pinpoint possible implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 228, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...ages of fewer financial problems in the individuals life, are crucial. According to my own ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1560.0 1207.87684729 129% => OK
No of words: 284.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49295774648 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0949242062 2.71678728327 114% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588028169014 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 379.143842365 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.6573203689 50.4703680194 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.818181818 104.977214359 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8181818182 20.9669160288 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.40059074177 0.242375264174 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148219652679 0.0925447433944 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0948443564448 0.071462118173 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228621409682 0.151781067708 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0615586902912 0.0609392437508 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 12.6369458128 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 53.1260098522 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 11.5310837438 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.27 8.32886699507 123% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 55.0591133005 176% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.