Recently, the phenomenon of spending too much time at work and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of spending time with family is highly beneficial, such issue regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that making time for leisure can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, consuming too much time at work can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of being successful in career, as well as being independent in financial issues, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the relationship between working as a full-time engineer and increasing income. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both raising working time and allocate much time to work apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, spending much more time at work might increase the consequences of emotional distance between family members. Moreover, fundamental aspects of the separated families could relate to this reality that the demerits of the departed parents pertain to destructive effects on children. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of working more hours per week is correlated negatively with getting away from family. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of working too much.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of working hardly far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of promotion in career prove the significance of getting wealthy, but also pinpoint the social prosperity implications.
- As cities expanding some people claim governments should look forward creating better networks of public transportation available for everyone rather than building more roads for vehicle owning population What s your opinion Give some examples or experien 88
- As cities expanding some people claim governments should look forward creating better networks of public transportation available for everyone rather than building more roads for vehicle owning population What s your opinion Give some examples or experien 85
- How to Successfully Handle Job and Studies at the same time 85
- Some people think imported food exerts positive impacts on our lives To what extent do you agree or disagree 77
- How widely do you think the problem spreads that people spend too much time on work than their personal life and experience time shortage What problems will it cause 85
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 31.9359605911 135% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1610.0 1207.87684729 133% => OK
No of words: 296.0 242.827586207 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43918918919 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05009759271 2.71678728327 112% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 139.433497537 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621621621622 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 379.143842365 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3767046785 50.4703680194 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.166666667 104.977214359 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 20.9669160288 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220121122823 0.242375264174 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0841102840441 0.0925447433944 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0607791589838 0.071462118173 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125244328623 0.151781067708 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0566331522679 0.0609392437508 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 53.1260098522 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 11.5310837438 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.43 8.32886699507 125% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 55.0591133005 191% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 31.9359605911 135% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1610.0 1207.87684729 133% => OK
No of words: 296.0 242.827586207 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43918918919 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05009759271 2.71678728327 112% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 139.433497537 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621621621622 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 379.143842365 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3767046785 50.4703680194 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.166666667 104.977214359 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 20.9669160288 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220121122823 0.242375264174 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0841102840441 0.0925447433944 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0607791589838 0.071462118173 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125244328623 0.151781067708 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0566331522679 0.0609392437508 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 53.1260098522 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 11.5310837438 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.43 8.32886699507 125% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 55.0591133005 191% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.