The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.
The date given in two tables depict how many coffee and bananas of Fairtrade-labelled are sold in UK, Switzerland, Denmark, Belgium and Sweden in 1999 and 2004.
Overall, Fairtrade-labelled merchandised much more bananas than coffee in Switzerland both in 1999 and 2004, and the figure were the highest ones in table. Sweden spent the least on coffee in both years while Belgium expended the smallest millions of euros on bananas in 1999, and it moved to Sweden in 2004.
It is clear evident that Denmark had the highest number in sale of coffee in 1999 (1.8 million of euros), but the first rank belonged to the UK in 2004 (20 million of euros). Sweden stood for the lowest point in both 1999 and 2004, at 0.8 million of euros and 1 million of euros respectively. Besides, the figures for sales of coffee in Switzerland and Belgium witnessed dramatic growths from 1999 to 2004.
Belgium’s expenses for bananas was only 0.6 million of euros in 1999, then it surged to 4 million of euros in 2004. Similarly, there was upsurge in banana sale in Switzerland from 15 million of euros to 47 million of euros over the span of five years and UK consumed 5.5 million of euros in 2004. While the UK’s number went up significantly more than five-folds, the remaining two countries’ reduced sharply.
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995 – 2002. 73
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport. 73
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010. 61
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 84
- The range of technology available to people is increasing the gap between the rich and the poor. Others think it has an opposite effect. Discuss both views and give opinions. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, if, similarly, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1086.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 225.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82666666667 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86163555064 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493333333333 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 309.6 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.0390628605 43.030603864 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 120.666666667 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.23603664747 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257464804602 0.215688989381 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13466208905 0.103423049105 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0703931251263 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196186361517 0.15604864568 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0589199354882 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.