Children should take large number of exams or learn more in schools.
Children should take a large number of exams or learn more in schools has always been a debatable topic. Many people believe that children should be more concentrated on learning rather than taking more tests while others reject this notion and argue that exams are the only method to assess their ability. In my opinion, I strongly agree that children should learn the content of the subjects that will yield good results in future both personally and professionally. This essay would further elaborate both sides with justifying reasons and thus lead to a plausible conclusion.
To commence with, nowadays, children are forced to write so many exams which are of no use in real life. A certain group of individuals thinks that exams are the best way to know the strong and weak points of the student, so that teacher can provide feedback and help students to improve his or her performance. In addition, exams are very strong motivation to children which encourage them to get higher and higher marks which creates competition among students.
On the other hand, in the fast running world, where innovations are happening on daily basis in every field. Schools and teachers have to focus more on teaching new technologies, innovations, and developments instead of conducting exams. Students should be taught more practical sessions instead of explaining the content in the textbooks, teachers are advised to teach them how machines work in real life with practical examples and ask them to repeat the same thing in labs. For instance, exams that are conducted in schools are of no use for children in real life. Exams are only to teach students how to memorize the content of subjects and write the same thing during the exam. Thus, the exams don't help them in the future life.
According to the arguments outlined above, one can reach out to the conclusion that learning will help students to gain the good knowledge of the course. In a nutshell, it can be concluded that children should be more concentrated on learning rather than participating in more exams.
- causes of Global warming? 77
- University only requires to apply digital media rather than continuously upgrading textbook Agree or disagree 82
- Some people believe that academic subjects such as chemistry, physics, and history should be taught in schools, while others believe that students will derive more benefit from studying practical subjects, such as motor mechanics and cooking. 77
- Some people believe that academic subjects such as chemistry, physics, and history should be taught in schools, while others believe that students will derive more benefit from studying practical subjects, such as motor mechanics and cooking. 77
- parents play imp role in educating children as teachers. Agree/disagree? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 22, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
Children should take a large number of exams or learn more in schools has alwa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 700, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... thing during the exam. Thus, the exams dont help them in the future life. Accord...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, thus, while, for instance, in addition, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 5.94088669951 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 31.9359605911 166% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1729.0 1207.87684729 143% => OK
No of words: 347.0 242.827586207 143% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98270893372 5.00649968141 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 3.92707691288 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60505342544 2.71678728327 96% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 139.433497537 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515850144092 0.580463131201 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 520.2 379.143842365 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.8063687064 50.4703680194 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.266666667 104.977214359 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1333333333 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 7.25397266985 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.375793998019 0.242375264174 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127585224739 0.0925447433944 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.148634399743 0.071462118173 208% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222329165764 0.151781067708 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.138193957356 0.0609392437508 227% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 12.6369458128 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.1260098522 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 11.5310837438 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.32886699507 99% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 55.0591133005 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.