Poverty is a major issue worldwide. Many charities exist to help collect monetary donations. Who should decide what donations are spent on? The people in need or the charitable organisations? Support your point of view with details from your own experiences, observations or reading.
Poverty has long been a global issue and today cash donations are collected by various charities and distributed to those in need. Some people believe that it’s charitable organisations should decide where to spend it. While others argue that it’s the needy people who should decide that where it’s required the most as they are part of that situation. I am inclined to believe that people who are in need can find of the areas where that money is required most and can make best out of it. This essay will discuss why people who are in need should decide where to spent it rather than charitable organizations.
To commence with, people who are working with charitable organizations often come from the other countries and they may be not aware of the local context, subtlety of the particular regions in which they are temporarily place. For instance, my friend does not know the conditions people live in Africa and what are their prime requirements and unable take decision which should favour people who are in need. Therefore, due to some constraints they can’t take best decision for people those need it.
On the flip side, people who are living in that situation can make wise decision to use that collected donations because they know about local context and understand the realities. For instance, people from poor village know very well that they need to have better infrastructure, primary education and skill the local people. So, the people who are themselves living in poverty can utilise the donation amount in best way possible and can rise above poverty.
In conclusion, the forgoing discussion propounds the view that it should be the poor people themselves who take control on their future by controlling the way in which donations are uses.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-05-22 | Manisha Verma | 80 | view |
| 2018-05-22 | Manisha Verma | 80 | view |
| 2018-05-22 | Manisha Verma | 75 | view |
- Medical technology is responsible for the human s life expectancy To what extent do you agree and disagree Or Medical technology helps to live long life Is that curse or blessings for society and mankind 89
- Medical technology is responsible for the human’s life expectancy. To what extent do you agree and disagree? 77
- Nowadays, the mass media including TV, radio and newspaper have become the essential part of our lives. What is your opinion? 77
- In developing countries, tourism has disadvantage or advantages. 85
- Animals deserve the same rights as humans and shouldn t be used by humans for food or research Discuss the statement analytically from both points of views Also take a stand on the topic 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 221, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'placed'.
Suggestion: placed
...r regions in which they are temporarily place. For instance, my friend does not know ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 461, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'take the best'.
Suggestion: take the best
...due to some constraints they can't take best decision for people those need it. O...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 412, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'in the best'.
Suggestion: in the best
...poverty can utilise the donation amount in best way possible and can rise above poverty...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, may, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 6.10837438424 311% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 25.0 5.94088669951 421% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 33.0 20.9802955665 157% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1494.0 1207.87684729 124% => OK
No of words: 298.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01342281879 5.00649968141 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.585312954 2.71678728327 95% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 139.433497537 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513422818792 0.580463131201 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 469.8 379.143842365 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.8337004387 50.4703680194 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.5 104.977214359 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8333333333 20.9669160288 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41666666667 7.25397266985 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25114252834 0.242375264174 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106374157079 0.0925447433944 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0414331292935 0.071462118173 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151640799021 0.151781067708 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0500514155057 0.0609392437508 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 12.6369458128 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.1260098522 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.5310837438 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.32886699507 97% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 55.0591133005 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 67.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.