The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The bar chart illustrates the proportion of the different age groups of the UK citizens spending money to charity in 1990 and 2010.
A glance at the chart indicates that while there were increasing proportions of people in 2 older age groups, 51-60 and over 60, the figures for younger donors declined by varying degrees after 20 years. Also, the percentage of 18-25-year-olds were significantly smaller than others in both surveyed years.
In details, in 1990, the largest proportion of UK residents donating money to charity was found in the 36-50 age group, at 43%, which was followed by that for the 51-65-year-olds at a little over one third. In contrast, there were only 17% of the youngest age group, 18-25, making donations. The proportions of donors among the 26-35 and over 65 age groups were comparable, standing at 31% and 32%, respectively.
After 2 decades, the percentage for the 51-65 age group increased by almost 5% to become the highest figure in 2010. The proportion of donators aged between 36-50, however, declined slightly to 35%, which was also the figure for the over sixties after a small rise. Lastly, the percentage of the 26 to 35 age group experienced a 7% drop to 24%, which was still about 3 times larger than that for donors aged 18-25.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-14 | MilanT | 73 | view |
| 2019-03-17 | Fenny Mahara | 61 | view |
- One of the consequences of improved medical care is that people are living longer and life expectancy is increasing.Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages ? 61
- Some people think that newly built houses should follow the style of old houses in local areas. Others think that people should have freedom to build houses of their own style.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 78
- What can governments do to encourage children to eat more healthily Write at least 250 words to discuss the topic 58
- The charts below show the results of a questionnaire that asked visitors to the Parkway Hotel how they rated the hotel's customer service. The same questionnaire was given to 100 guests in the years 2005 and 2010. 78
- The table below shows the expenditures of four car companies in the UK in 2002. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, lastly, so, still, third, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1063.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87614678899 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74554601012 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550458715596 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 297.0 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5664778928 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.111111111 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2222222222 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175966406601 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.086055228118 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0414487966048 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126382761997 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0261694931354 0.0819641961636 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.