The chart below gives information about European people of different age groups who went to gym once a month or more between 1990 and 2010.
The line chart illustrates the percentage of European people going to gym in 4 age groups: 18-24, 25-34, 35-44, 45 and over from 1990 to 2010.
Overall, the portion of all age groups showed an increase over the period, especially group 18-24 with the most remarkable rise.
In 1990, starting as the highest among 4 groups at about 9%, the 25-34 group then experienced a dramatic increase to 50% in 2010, nearly 5 times higher than in the beginning year. At 8%/ the 18-24 age group ranked second in 1990 and skyrocketed to its peak in 2006 at about 58%, 7 times higher than in 1990. After taking a slight plunge to 51% in 2008, the percentage of 18-24 group the made a recovery to about 58% in 2010.
The 35-44 age group leapt from about 4% in 1990 to 40% in 2010. Following the similar pattern, the portion of people aged 45 and over also started at about 3% which was the lowest among 4 groups, gradually increasing to its highest point at about 21% in 2010.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-27 | Trần Ánh Vy | 67 | view |
| 2022-11-30 | Nhi7.5 | view | |
| 2022-11-30 | Nhi7.5 | view | |
| 2018-06-03 | Chi Nguyen | 72 | view |
- The old tradition of a family having a meal together is disappearing. Why do you think this is happening? How does it affect individuals and the community? 78
- The difference in age between parents and their children has increased compared to the past Do you think advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages 88
- The chart below gives the information of cinema attendance by age group between 1984 and 2000. 78
- The chart below gives information about European people of different age groups who went to gym once a month or more between 1990 and 2010 72
- The chart below shows the percentage of female members of parliament in 5 European countries from 2000 to 2012. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The line chart illustrates the percentag...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...-44, 45 and over from 1990 to 2010. Overall, the portion of all age groups s...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...8-24 with the most remarkable rise. In 1990, starting as the highest among 4...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ade a recovery to about 58% in 2010. The 35-44 age group leapt from about 4% ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, second, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 795.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.46629213483 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29285761902 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556179775281 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 204.3 283.868780488 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.1 1.45097560976 76% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0703463057 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.571428571 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4285714286 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.14285714286 5.23603664747 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265236048144 0.215688989381 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145540599281 0.103423049105 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.050758549539 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171231903136 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0510830544748 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 88.4 61.2550243902 144% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.1 10.3012195122 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.94 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.27 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.