The chart below gives information about European people of different age groups who went to gym once a month or more between 1990 and 2010.
The line chart illustrates the percentage of European people going to gym in 4 age groups: 18-24, 25-34, 35-44, 45 and over from 1990 to 2010.
Overall, the portion of all age groups showed an increase over the period, especially group 18-24 with the most remarkable rise.
In 1990, starting as the highest among 4 groups at about 9%, the 25-34 group then experienced a dramatic increase to 50% in 2010, nearly 5 times higher than in the beginning year. At 8%/ the 18-24 age group ranked second in 1990 and skyrocketed to its peak in 2006 at about 58%, 7 times higher than in 1990. After taking a slight plunge to 51% in 2008, the percentage of 18-24 group the made a recovery to about 58% in 2010.
The 35-44 age group leapt from about 4% in 1990 to 40% in 2010. Following the similar pattern, the portion of people aged 45 and over also started at about 3% which was the lowest among 4 groups, gradually increasing to its highest point at about 21% in 2010.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-27 | Trần Ánh Vy | 67 | view |
| 2022-11-30 | Nhi7.5 | view | |
| 2022-11-30 | Nhi7.5 | view | |
| 2018-06-03 | Chi Nguyen | 72 | view |
- Some people think that it is a waste of money for countries to host big sporting events like the world cup and that the money would be better spent on other things However others think that hosting large sporting events has a clear positive impact on a co 94
- Some people think that it is a waste of money for countries to host big sporting events like the world cup, and that the money would be better spent on other things. However, others think that hosting large sporting events has a clear, positive impact on 84
- The chart below shows the percentage of female members of parliament in 5 European countries from 2000 to 2012. 67
- The chart below shows the percentage of female members of parliament in 5 European countries from 2000 to 2012. 67
- The chart below gives the information of cinema attendance by age group between 1984 and 2000. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The line chart illustrates the percentag...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...-44, 45 and over from 1990 to 2010. Overall, the portion of all age groups s...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...8-24 with the most remarkable rise. In 1990, starting as the highest among 4...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ade a recovery to about 58% in 2010. The 35-44 age group leapt from about 4% ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, second, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 795.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.46629213483 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29285761902 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556179775281 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 204.3 283.868780488 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.1 1.45097560976 76% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0703463057 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.571428571 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4285714286 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.14285714286 5.23603664747 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265236048144 0.215688989381 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145540599281 0.103423049105 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.050758549539 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171231903136 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0510830544748 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 88.4 61.2550243902 144% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.1 10.3012195122 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.94 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.27 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.