Should public schools server healthy, locally-grown foods to children?
Recently, the phenomenon serving healthy locally-grown food and introducing hands-on in their curriculum and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although, contested by many that giving locally-grown food is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly constructive and positive by a substantial number of people. I am inclined to believe that serving highly nutrition foods to children can be positive and I will analyze that thoroughly this essay.
From compatible standpoint, there are myriad reasons why highly nutrition food must be part of their lunch diet. One of them is high nutrition found in locally-grown fresh vegetables which is epitome source of lunch's menu. In addition, students consume this diet and perform with greater efficiency and result into high marks in examination. Parents at home can espouse for the menu in lunch. With variance of diet in lunch everyday will provide adequate vitamins and protein.
From contrary standpoint, preponderant reasons why hands-on should be introduced in their study is awareness of foods and menu ingredients. For example students get vast knowledge for ingredients. Later in growing age, they make themselves self-dependent of food ingredients to get rid of malnutrition. People believe that knowledge about food provide adequate difference in their power of distinguish in term of nutrition. In today's time, people are very aware and emphasize the nutrition value in meal.
In recapitulate, as aforementioned, necessity of introducing foods in their curriculum and providing diet of locally-grown food provide ample advantages in their lives. I will recommend, scrutiny must be persuasive for fact of malnutrition in students.
- Some people think placing advertisements in schools is a great resource for public schools that need additional funding, but others think it exploits children by treating them as a captive audience for corporate sponsors. 77
- A county becomes more interesting and develops more quickly when its population includes a mixture of nationalities. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 11
- Many newspapers and magazines feature stories about the private lives of famous people. We know what they eat, where they buy their clothes and who they love. We also often see pictures of them in private situations. Is it appropriate for a magazine or ne 75
- What are the main reasons of violent behavior in the professional institutions today? 77
- Do you think that place where the person grew up has an influence on his accomplishments ? Explain with examples. 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll analyze that thoroughly this essay. From compatible standpoint, there are my...
^^
Line 2, column 426, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...n lunch. With variance of diet in lunch everyday will provide adequate vitamins and prot...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...provide adequate vitamins and protein. From contrary standpoint, preponderant r...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...emphasize the nutrition value in meal. In recapitulate, as aforementioned, nece...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, for example, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 31.9359605911 135% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1459.0 1207.87684729 121% => OK
No of words: 259.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.6332046332 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19242219294 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583011583012 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 379.143842365 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.3199976182 50.4703680194 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.2666666667 104.977214359 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2666666667 20.9669160288 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.13333333333 7.25397266985 29% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183602655329 0.242375264174 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.057670689698 0.0925447433944 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0567119687036 0.071462118173 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117968538302 0.151781067708 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0525178916058 0.0609392437508 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 12.6369458128 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 53.1260098522 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 11.5310837438 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.32886699507 112% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 55.0591133005 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.