Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is believed that the expense for foreigners to visit the monuments and tourism sites should be charged more than the residents in that country. I personally agree with this opinion.
Initially, the higher prices for foreign visitors will probably enhance and develop the tourism industry of the local area. Indeed, the extra costs that oversea tourists pay for the entrance and visiting activities can contribute effectively to increase the income of tourism in these cultural and historical sites, which then, is invested in repairing and maintaining the architecture and facilities in these areas. Hence, the beauty and values of the important sites will be not temporary but lasted for longer, which serves the sustainable development of the local tourism.
Besides that, paying more for cultural and historical attractions is considered as a sense of respect toward local traditional values. In fact, the citizen if the country are the constructors and creators of the cultural buildings. In addition, the knowledge and experience that the foreign visitors obtained in the journey is valuable and deserved with what they spent. Therefore, they should reward the incredible architectures and values belonging to these works as a genre of performance of their high appreciation by expending more money.
In conclusion, the visiting fees in the places of cultural tourism and historic interest for oversea tourists should be higher than that for local people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-12 | Rizvi007 | 56 | view |
| 2019-07-10 | fachryadul92 | 56 | view |
| 2018-06-05 | Kelly Pham | 56 | view |
| 2018-06-05 | Kelly Pham | 56 | view |
- Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information, such as their hobbies and interest, and whether they are married or single. Some people say that this information may be relevant and useful. Other disagree. Discuss both views and 73
- Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... appreciation by expending more money. In conclusion, the visiting fees in the ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, hence, if, so, then, therefore, in addition, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1244.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 229.0 315.596192385 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43231441048 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82375110413 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 176.041082164 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56768558952 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 385.2 506.74238477 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.1022912827 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.4 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.1 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.339072689361 0.244688304435 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122635018559 0.084324248473 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0659917833431 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203394812825 0.151304729494 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.032619791834 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.9 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.