Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information, such as their hobbies and interest, and whether they are married or single. Some people say that this information may be relevant and useful. Other disagree. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Human resources play a vital role in the development of the businesses and entrepreneurs so setting bunch of criteria for recruitment are extremely necessary to hunt potential candidates for companies. While individual background which includes favorites and passion are highly appreciated as a job requirement in some fields, I totally agree that generally these information is not relevant and necessary for employers in the process of hiring new staff.
On the one hand, it is a fact that personal information has become one of the priority concerns of employers when considering and recruiting employees. In fact, toward some fields of business, understanding candidates' hobbies and interests will probably assist recruiters effectively to select the most appropriate person who desire to cooperate with the team and company in a long term and contribute themselves to the organization and the success of the business. In particular, tour guide recruitment is a typical example for this opinion. With the belief that love and passion for traveling and photographic perspectives can be an advantage of an individual which will support the tour guide in their journeys and maintain their fire of enthusiasm when working, employers often pay attention in candidates' sharing about their personal background when looking the resume, mentioning and observing in the interview. Hence, they tend to prefer those with interest in tourism for the vacancy position. Similarly, marital status also affect the tour guide as marriage often limit time and enthusiasm of the workers in their work than single status.
On the other hand, most companies respect personal life and background of individuals as a part of their democratic rights and draw more concern in other aspects of employees such as their experience and skills so these information is not necessary in general. Initially, in the modern working environment, interests and hobbies of the workers are isolated with the business matter so personal aspects are often be respected by avoiding to mention because some people may be not willing to share it with others. Besides that, as the fundamental purpose of headhunting is finding out the potential candidate who they can work with and bring more benefits for the business, personal information is just a tiny issues which is overwhelm by applicants' working experience and skills. Indeed, what recruiters emphasize on is how employees can address the problems occurring when working with colleges and partners based on their practical lessons, achievement and skills previously in other businesses or their activities. Therefore, as can be seen in almost interviews, what the interviewers demand is not candidates' personal information but demonstration of their abilities and prospects to dedicate for the company in the future.
In conclusion, despite some advantages of understanding personal background in some circumstances, these information is not regarding the success of recruitment and should not be mentioned in details.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-06-09 | Kelly Pham | 73 | view |
- Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information, such as their hobbies and interest, and whether they are married or single. Some people say that this information may be relevant and useful. Other disagree. Discuss both views and 73
- Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 359, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this information' or 'these informations'?
Suggestion: this information; these informations
... fields, I totally agree that generally these information is not relevant and necessary for emplo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 155, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...considering and recruiting employees. In fact, toward some fields of business, un...
^^
Line 3, column 926, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g and observing in the interview. Hence, they tend to prefer those with interest ...
^^
Line 5, column 215, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this information' or 'these informations'?
Suggestion: this information; these informations
... such as their experience and skills so these information is not necessary in general. Initially,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 709, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'issue'?
Suggestion: issue
...ss, personal information is just a tiny issues which is overwhelm by applicants workin...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 725, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'overwhelmed'.
Suggestion: overwhelmed
...ormation is just a tiny issues which is overwhelm by applicants working experience and sk...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 100, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this information' or 'these informations'?
Suggestion: this information; these informations
...sonal background in some circumstances, these information is not regarding the success of recruit...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, if, look, may, regarding, similarly, so, therefore, thus, while, in conclusion, in general, in particular, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 10.4138276553 240% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 41.998997996 157% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2575.0 1615.20841683 159% => OK
No of words: 469.0 315.596192385 149% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49040511727 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65364457471 4.20363070211 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06596611333 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 176.041082164 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511727078891 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 798.3 506.74238477 158% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 33.0 20.2975951904 163% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 79.6370593662 49.4020404114 161% => OK
Chars per sentence: 183.928571429 106.682146367 172% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.5 20.7667163134 161% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4285714286 7.06120827912 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264243100584 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0936199655103 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0353541140304 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155263352028 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0371451004495 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.2 13.0946893788 162% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.52 50.2224549098 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.3 11.3001002004 153% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.92 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 138.0 78.4519038076 176% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.78957915832 169% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.1190380762 150% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.