Some people say that computer games are bad for children by all means; others believe that these games are contributing to children development. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
There has been a significant advancement in the field of science and technology. Computer is not exceptional. Presently, some masses reckon that computer games are harmful for offspring’s whereas, others believe that these games are lucrative for the overall development of adolescents. Here, I would like to account for both sides with my own perception.
There are multifarious negative aspects of this phenomena. First and foremost, in this contemporary world, computer games may adversely effects on health of children. For example, nowadays, infants spend prolonged hours in front of computer, laptop and mobile phones and further it, leads to sedentary lifestyle. As a result, in future, the children become victim of health hazards such as week optics, headache, migraine, respiratory illness and many more. Consequently, computer games are bad for juveniles.
There are numerous positive aspects of this trend. To commence with, computer games are lucrative for infants to broaden knowledge horizon. To examplify, in video games pupils have to explore enormous ideas and take decisions to pass out the distinct stages.As a result, the children become skillful and creative. Consequently, computer games are lucrative for infants.
In my notion, both aspects have their own significance. Undeniably, computer games has several drawbacks. However, computer games are lucrative for the betterment of children. Therefore, the children should be played these games under the parental restrictions so that the darker side of this phenomenon can be curbed.
To recapitulate, games become indispensable part of every individual. Undeniably, computer games has several disadvantages. However, it is beneficial for the development of adolescents.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2018-06-30 | Komal6338 | 67 | view |
2018-06-17 | Parminder Gill | 34 | view |
- Some people say that computer games are bad for children by all means; others believe that these games are contributing to children development. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 34
- Some people say that computer games are bad for children by all means;others believe that these games are contributing to children’ development.Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 61
- Topic - prevention is better than cureOut of country’s budget,a large proportion of money should be diverted from treatments to spending on health education and preventive measures .To what extent do you agree or disagree ? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 209, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ful for offspring's whereas, others believe that these games are lucrative f...
^^
Line 4, column 44, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...re are multifarious negative aspects of this phenomena. First and foremost, in this ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 327, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ds to sedentary lifestyle. As a result, in future, the children become victim of health h...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 259, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: As
...cisions to pass out the distinct stages.As a result, the children become skillful ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, however, if, may, so, therefore, whereas, for example, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1513.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.8416988417 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11285040742 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579150579151 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 20.2975951904 59% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.6209311871 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.65 106.682146367 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 12.95 20.7667163134 62% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.353460747346 0.244688304435 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112039677755 0.084324248473 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0894139040541 0.0667982634062 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208694809661 0.151304729494 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0397763532915 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.38 50.2224549098 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.7 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.1190380762 67% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.