Government should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Living with multitude of dangers, strategists and congested scoiety, perhaps we individuals always like to foster this debate, as what mode of transportation is more fesable for public and how government should take the reponsibility of building great infracture like other developed countries. In this essay, i will talk about both railways and roadways with its benifits and downsides, quoting few examples and proivide a reasonable conclusion, as which is the best mode of transportation for countries like India.
Well, many belive that railways are lighter on pockets, compared to roadways. Yes, this is very true, as railways carries a huge number of passangers to their desired destinations in a single trip, thus the cost is divided between a huge number of passangers. While others belive that, laying paths for railways costs more to government as well as environment, where mass distruction of trees and forests are inevitable factors involved in laying railways. We must alos consider the fact that, narrow bends and curves cannot be a feasable options for buildaing railways, where it is an favourable option available while building roadways, making sure environment is not distrubed at a large extent.
On contrary, roadways connects each cities, villages, even remote localities. This is a great advantage of raodways compared to railwars, which provides easy access to your doorstep for passangers. Where as, railways and airports cannot be constructed in a busy or residential areas, perhaps it must be quite far away from congested city limits. This, roadways are essential mode for any pasaangers to reach home safely.
Hence, considering both pros and cons, i believ gvernment should have a balanced approach towards funding railways and also roadways, as both palys a vital role in public transportation system.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-08 | edsonsimoes | 65 | view |
| 2019-08-06 | edsonsimoes | 65 | view |
| 2019-07-27 | bashob | 77 | view |
| 2018-06-21 | vinay.zigma | 85 | view |
| 2018-04-23 | priyanka pinky | 55 | view |
- Xenophobia has accelerated rapidly in the Western countries. According to you what solutions can be proposed 11
- Everyone Should Adopt Vegetarianism 77
- In some countries, a few people earn extremely high salaries. Some people think that this is good for a country, while others believe that the government should control salaries and limit the amount people can earn. Discuss both sides and express your opi 55
- Everyone Should Adopt Vegetarianism 77
- In some countries, a few people earn extremely high salaries. Some people think that this is good for a country, while others believe that the government should control salaries and limit the amount people can earn. Discuss both sides and express your opi 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 311, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...her developed countries. In this essay, i will talk about both railways and roadw...
^
Line 2, column 584, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ons for buildaing railways, where it is an favourable option available while build...
^^
Line 3, column 198, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Whereas'?
Suggestion: Whereas
...access to your doorstep for passangers. Where as, railways and airports cannot be constr...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1549.0 1207.87684729 128% => OK
No of words: 288.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37847222222 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91914370676 2.71678728327 107% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 139.433497537 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642361111111 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 379.143842365 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.9095046684 50.4703680194 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.818181818 104.977214359 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1818181818 20.9669160288 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.54545454545 7.25397266985 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16895864294 0.242375264174 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0582631262353 0.0925447433944 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0358510254496 0.071462118173 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0902497665863 0.151781067708 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0394508575789 0.0609392437508 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 53.1260098522 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 11.5310837438 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.86 8.32886699507 118% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 55.0591133005 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.