The table shows the proportion of pupils attending four secondary school types between 2000 and 2009.
The given tabular chart highlights the information about the proportion of students different types of secondary school in year 2008,2005 and 2009. The data calibrated in number of percentum. Which is clearly and coherently represented.
It can be seen that, during the year 2000 specialist schools had been attending 12% moreover same year grammar schools had 24% attendance thirdly voluntary-controlled schools had 52% as well as the community schools was attended 12% student furthermore the specialist schools during the year 2000, 2005 and 2009 was attended 12%, 11% and 10% respectively.
As far as, trend was concerned in the year 2005 and 2009 specialist schools had been 11% and 10% secondly grammar schools had 19% and 12% and the voluntary-controlled schools had 38% and 20% in year 2005 and 2009 the last one was community schools had been attended 32% and 58%.
Overall, it is evident that during the year 2000, 2005 and 2009 had increase attendance percentage.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-06 | Đa Thiện | 61 | view |
| 2019-10-12 | Lia Bui | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-12 | Jotdeep | 78 | view |
| 2019-07-28 | harshiniharshini | 78 | view |
| 2019-07-05 | anmol khipal | 73 | view |
- Percentage of food budget spent on restaurant meals and home cooking? 56
- The diagram below show how glass containers, such as bottles, are produced and recycled. 78
- The climograph below shows the average monthly temperatures and rainfall the city of Kolkata. 61
- The table shows the proportion of pupils attending four secondary school types between 2000 and 2009. 73
- The climograph below shows the average monthly temperatures and rainfall the city of Kolkata. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 316, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... during the year 2000, 2005 and 2009 was attended 12%, 11% and 10% respectively. ...
^^
Line 4, column 44, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rall, it is evident that during the year 2000, 2005 and 2009 had increase attenda...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, moreover, second, secondly, third, thirdly, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 33.7804878049 33% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 820.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18987341772 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12640290573 2.65546596893 118% => OK
Unique words: 80.0 106.607317073 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.506329113924 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 206.1 283.868780488 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 117.787473395 43.030603864 274% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 136.666666667 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3333333333 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.8333333333 5.23603664747 245% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247640583162 0.215688989381 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120494724365 0.103423049105 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0902436640268 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169193476861 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0274462506069 0.0819641961636 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.