The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relavant.
The bar chart provides the information about the tendency of having fast food of American people studied over a period of 11 years from 2003 to 2013.
Overall, it is clear that most of the people consumed fast food either once a week or once or twice a month.
Looking at the details, the proportion of people who ate fast food once or twice a month was 30% in 2003 and, while this figure declined by 5% in 2006, around 3% more people did the same in 2013. However, fast food restaurants served the heaviest proportion of customers once a week in 2006, standing at around 33% compared to 31% and 28% in 2003 and 2013 respectively.
As we can see further, the lowest percentage of below 4% of American’s consumed fast food on a daily basis, whereas only around 1% more people had never eaten fast food during the mentioned period. Moreover, while around 15 to 20% of people had had fast food several times in a week, the figure was only 13 to 15% for those who ate a few times a year throughout the years.
- Some people use the internet to search for solutions to their medical problems Is it a Positive or negative development Give your own opinion and examples from your own experience 89
- Due to the use of computers and mobiles phones, letter-writing ability is disappearing. To what extent do you agree? 73
- The trend of increased consumer goods production is damaging the natural environment Why is it still happening What are the solutions for this situation 84
- Some people believe that it s not necessary to have internet access to live a full life What is your opinion Give reasons for your answer and include examples from your own experience 80
- Social media has replaced the traditional methods of communication and people use more and more social media to communicate and to follow news and events Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 94
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 247, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: had
...eover, while around 15 to 20% of people had had fast food several times in a week, the ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, look, moreover, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 831.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.42021276596 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43765053046 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574468085106 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 242.1 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 31.3550456687 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.5 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.3333333333 22.9334400587 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233271223735 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128704760151 0.103423049105 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.040730117854 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148231658199 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0430705017522 0.0819641961636 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.39 61.2550243902 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.95 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.