In 1930, 75% of the labour force in the USA was employed in farming, fishing and foresting whileonly 10% worked in sales and office and trade. At the same time both the Industrial sector and thetechnical sector constituted just 2% of the workforce each. T

Essay topics:

In 1930, 75% of the labour force in the USA was employed in farming, fishing and foresting while
only 10% worked in sales and office and trade. At the same time both the Industrial sector and the
technical sector constituted just 2% of the workforce each. This situation changed only very
gradually over the next 20 years, except for the technical workforce, which increased more than
threefold.
However by 1980 there had been a significant change in the pattern of employment. While the
farming, fishing and foresting employees had declined in number to 40% of the workforce, Industrial
employees as well as technical had increased their share to 13% and 10% respectively.
Similarly the sales and office sectors did not increase until 1980. The most dramatic change could
be seen by 2000, when the proportion of farming, fishing and foresting works reduced to just 10%
while the three other major sectors had all increased to over 20% of the workforce.

In 1930, 75% of the labour force in the USA was employed in farming, fishing and foresting while
only 10% worked in sales and office and trade. At the same time both the Industrial sector and the
technical sector constituted just 2% of the workforce each. This situation changed only very
gradually over the next 20 years, except for the technical workforce, which increased more than
threefold.
However by 1980 there had been a significant change in the pattern of employment. While the
farming, fishing and foresting employees had declined in number to 40% of the workforce, Industrial
employees as well as technical had increased their share to 13% and 10% respectively.
Similarly the sales and office sectors did not increase until 1980. The most dramatic change could
be seen by 2000, when the proportion of farming, fishing and foresting works reduced to just 10%
while the three other major sectors had all increased to over 20% of the workforce.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-10-01 Sprios_D 73 view
2020-10-01 Sprios_D view
Essays by user kimloantt :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 97, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in farming, fishing and foresting while only 10% worked in sales and office and ...
^^^
Line 2, column 99, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... time both the Industrial sector and the technical sector constituted just 2% of ...
^^^
Line 3, column 93, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e each. This situation changed only very gradually over the next 20 years, except...
^^^
Line 4, column 96, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cal workforce, which increased more than threefold. However by 1980 there had be...
^^^
Line 6, column 91, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in the pattern of employment. While the farming, fishing and foresting employees...
^^^
Line 7, column 100, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mber to 40% of the workforce, Industrial employees as well as technical had incre...
^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
...eir share to 13% and 10% respectively. Similarly the sales and office sectors did not in...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 98, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...til 1980. The most dramatic change could be seen by 2000, when the proportion of ...
^^^
Line 10, column 97, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and foresting works reduced to just 10% while the three other major sectors had ...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, similarly, well, while, except for, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 816.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63838847595 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59375 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 229.5 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.5997152341 43.030603864 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.571428571 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8571428571 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.42857142857 5.23603664747 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 10.0 3.83414634146 261% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 9.0 1.69756097561 530% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.430601162888 0.215688989381 200% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.204125612462 0.103423049105 197% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.199292986987 0.0843802449381 236% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16464068715 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.160398373443 0.0819641961636 196% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.