in many countries, the proportion of older people is steadily increasing. Does this trend have more positive or negative effects on the society?
Recently, the issue of old population growth has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "Does this increasing trend have positive or negative impacts on our society?". Whereas it is a widely held view that increasing proportion of older people can have both positive and negative effects on the society, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the social standpoint, the aging population problem is bound up inextricably with decreasing population growth, which indicates that they lead to both decreasing birth rate and lack of workforce. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between the working age and retirement age as well as an exponential increase in the generation gap. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented so far supports the contention that likelihood of age discrimination is correlated positively with not only emotional and physical vulnerabilities but also pensioners and longevity.
Within the realm of economy, without the slightest doubt, population aging attribute to more financial pressures on government, in that it would come down to pension commitments, health insurance costs, and extra nursing costs. A salient example of such attribution is a holistic pension scheme, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take the working population for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint the labor market problems. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of elderly care charges.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes, "all's well that ends well, " after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that increasing number of older people in the society can have some serious negative impacts on the future of our society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-18 | neelu sharma | 77 | view |
| 2019-01-05 | farshid2370 | 77 | view |
| 2019-01-05 | farshid2370 | 55 | view |
| 2018-09-22 | MehdiKhodadadi | 85 | view |
| 2018-09-22 | MehdiKhodadadi | 85 | view |
- Some people think that cars should be banned from large cities.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 88
- Some people think that cars should be banned from large cities. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 88
- in many countries, the proportion of older people is steadily increasing. Does this trend have more positive or negative effects on the society? 77
- Some people think that cars should be banned from large cities. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 85
- Some people think that cars should be banned from large cities. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, if, so, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 5.75862068966 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1670.0 1207.87684729 138% => OK
No of words: 300.0 242.827586207 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56666666667 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11923067438 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 139.433497537 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.656666666667 0.580463131201 113% => OK
syllable_count: 522.9 379.143842365 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.1914742722 50.4703680194 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.818181818 104.977214359 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2727272727 20.9669160288 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.63636363636 7.25397266985 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18408675396 0.242375264174 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0588536385281 0.0925447433944 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0864335482087 0.071462118173 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116558188654 0.151781067708 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115396820249 0.0609392437508 189% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 12.6369458128 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 53.1260098522 67% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 11.5310837438 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.5 8.32886699507 126% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 55.0591133005 191% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.