The three pie charts below show the change in annual spending by UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001
The 3 circular charts depict the information about annual expenditure of five different amounts for a UK school in three years : 1981, 1991, and 2001. The data is calibrated in per centum which is clearly and coherently represented.
It can be seen that in these three years more money spent on teachers salaries as compared to others. The percentage of teachers salaries in 1981, 1991, and 2001 was 40%, 50%, and 45% respectively. Moreover, other workers salary was slightly decreased by 6-7% in 1991 and 2001. Money spent on books in 1981 was 5% less than 1991, and in 2001 it was drop-off by 11%.
On the other hand, Furniture and equipment consumed 15% money in 1981, 5% in 1991, and 23% in 2001. A little amount of money spent on insurance, and it was slightly increased in these three years.
Overall, it is evident that insurance and teacher salaries was increased step by step, while other workers salaries decreased, and the rest was fluctuated.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-28 | Sandhu param | 73 | view |
2020-01-25 | Noah1997 | 33 | view |
2020-01-22 | pateldhruv1708 | 67 | view |
2020-01-10 | Ali Elameen | 73 | view |
2020-01-10 | Ali Elameen | 67 | view |
- The three pie charts below show the change in annual spending by UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001 78
- The bar chart below shows the results of survey conducted by a personnel department at a major company. The survey was carried out on 2 groups of workers : those aged from 18-30 and those aged 45-60, and shows factors affecting their work performance. 78
- Some people believe that should people keep all money they have earned and should not pay tax to the state. Do you agree or disagree? 61
- Nowadays people throw away old things and adapt new things. Do the disadvantages of throwaway Society outweigh any possible economic advantages? 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 215, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'workers'' or 'worker's'?
Suggestion: workers'; worker's
..., and 45% respectively. Moreover, other workers salary was slightly decreased by 6-7% i...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 798.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83636363636 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6025211935 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569696969697 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 215.1 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 0.482926829268 1449% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.527879581 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.6666666667 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22222222222 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230041512064 0.215688989381 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106532649393 0.103423049105 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104338873962 0.0843802449381 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144410462727 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101960777691 0.0819641961636 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.