The charts below give information about the way in which water was used in different countries in 2000.water use selected countries 2000.
The Charts illustrate the world wide used of water for various purposes by seven different countries in 2000.The data calibrated in percentage.
Have a look on the pie chart, large proportion of water which was used for industry about seven in ten while, it was 48% lesser than utilised on agriculture as compare to the former. In case of domestic things, only just above a fifth percent water consumed.
By having a glance on other countries, Canada recommended 80% water for the motive of industry and domestic, agriculture 12% and 8% respectively. The consumption of water 92% by India on agriculture and the New Zealand 48% lesser than water consumed on this purpose in 2000 .Afterwards, domestic things and industries were negligible figures.69%water used on agriculture 22% on industry and near about a one in ten for domestic purpose by China in 2000.
Overall, the large quantity of water which preferred for agriculture in India as well as Canada used for industrial purpose.
- The Charts summarise the weight measurement of people living in Charlestown in 1955 and 2015 71
- The pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sector in New Zealand in 2003 and 2013. 61
- There are many types of music in the world today. Why do we need music? Is traditional music of a country more important than international music or not? 61
- Percentage of food budget spent on restaurant meals. 78
- The graph below shows female unemployment rates in each country of the United Kingdom in 2013 and 2014. 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 27, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: worldwide
The Charts illustrate the world wide used of water for various purposes by s...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 27, Rule ID: WORLD_WIDE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'worldwide'?
Suggestion: worldwide
The Charts illustrate the world wide used of water for various purposes by s...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 110, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...es by seven different countries in 2000.The data calibrated in percentage. Have a...
^^^
Line 3, column 58, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e on other countries, Canada recommended 80% water for the motive of industry an...
^^
Line 3, column 96, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed 80% water for the motive of industry and domestic, agriculture 12% and 8% res...
^^
Line 3, column 275, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...n water consumed on this purpose in 2000 .Afterwards, domestic things and industri...
^^
Line 3, column 277, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Afterwards
...water consumed on this purpose in 2000 .Afterwards, domestic things and industries were ne...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 825.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06134969325 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95767882842 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564417177914 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.9003940648 43.030603864 167% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.5 112.824112599 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1666666667 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.333927672821 0.215688989381 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.170923217017 0.103423049105 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0952785789982 0.0843802449381 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221285200845 0.15604864568 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.067819505468 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 61.2550243902 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.