the charts below give information about the way in which water used in different countries in 2000.
The given layout demonstrate the information about the usage of water. Which were used by the people of four different nations in 2000. The data is calibrated in per centum.
It is clearly seen that, in 2000, the usage of water in all world. First of all, 70% of people were using water on agriculture processing. On the other hand, 22% of people were using to water on industry processed in whole world. As well as, the Usage of the water on domestic processed always a mere 8% of total in all world.
Moving ahead, in 2000, around 80% of each people were using to water on agriculture in two different nations( Japan and India) whereas, 80% of water utilise by the people of Canadian on industries. Moreover, around 40% of each water used on agriculture and domestic processed in New Zealand. Furthermore, the usage of water on domestic processed in Canada , India and China was 12 ,5 and 9 percent respectively.
Overall, it is evident that, the highest usage of water on agriculture in two nations ( Japan and India ) as campare to the lowest usage of water on domestic proccess in both nations.
- the charts below give information about the way in which water used in different countries in 2000. 67
- Essay topics: The charts below show the percentage of their food budget the average family spent on restaurant meals in different years. The graph shows the number of meals eaten in fast food restaurants and sit-down restaurants. 56
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular uk school in 1981,1991 and 2001. 73
- The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in new port city center from 2003-2012. 67
- Nowadays people throw away old things and adapts new things . Do the disadvantages of throwaway society outweigh any possible economic advantages. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 72, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e information about the usage of water. Which were used by the people of four differe...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 277, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put before the verb 'processed'.
Suggestion: always processed
... as, the Usage of the water on domestic processed always a mere 8% of total in all world. Movi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 354, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...of water on domestic processed in Canada , India and China was 12 ,5 and 9 percent...
^^
Line 3, column 379, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...essed in Canada , India and China was 12 ,5 and 9 percent respectively. Overall,...
^^
Line 4, column 86, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e of water on agriculture in two nations Japan and India as campare to the lowes...
^^
Line 4, column 103, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...iculture in two nations Japan and India as campare to the lowest usage of water ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, moreover, well, whereas, as well as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 904.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65979381443 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59881123889 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.463917525773 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.9473064912 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.1818181818 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6363636364 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.36363636364 5.23603664747 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234198814067 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108095444149 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0712821677047 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167288962309 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0880859068593 0.0819641961636 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.45 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.4329268293 48% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.