The charts below give information about the way in which water was used in different countries in 2000.
The given charts depict the information about water consumption in different countries such as: Canada, New Zealand, India and China. The data is calibrated in percentum. It is clear and correct representation.
It can be seen that in Canada water used in agriculture field was 8%.After that, it was used for two another purposes such as: domestic and industry the amount used was 12% and 80%. Moreover, China used water in agriculture, domestic and industry were 96%,9%and 22% respectively.
In addition with this New Zealand consume water for agriculture purpose it was 44% as well as for domestic purpose was 46%. Furthermore, Industries use small proportion and it was only 10%.
Overall, it is evident that, water used in each and every field for different purposes. But, the demand of water in agriculture field was highest as compare to others.
- ,,, the charts below give information about the way in which water was used in different countries in 2000 56
- Polygamy has lead to massive divorce rate around the globe. Give possible solution and discuss the reasons behind the issue. 56
- Which job is better self employment or company and institutional job. Give your opinions. 56
- Some people believe that presenting natural environment is a crucial however most make no efforts to do so? why do you think this is happening? what are simple action that could help the environment. 11
- the chart below give information about the way in which water was used in different countries in 2000. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 70, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: After
... water used in agriculture field was 8%.After that, it was used for two another purpo...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 169, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...omestic and industry the amount used was 12% and 80%. Moreover, China used water ...
^^
Line 5, column 4, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...were 96%,9%and 22% respectively. In addition with this New Zealand consume water for...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, moreover, well, as for, in addition, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 13.0 33.7804878049 38% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 721.0 965.302439024 75% => OK
No of words: 140.0 196.424390244 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.43979062825 3.73543355544 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84908685694 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 83.0 106.607317073 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592857142857 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 222.3 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.2420391109 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.1111111111 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5555555556 22.9334400587 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 5.23603664747 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29651655761 0.215688989381 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111779525796 0.103423049105 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0798910751451 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179825305473 0.15604864568 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0317191981393 0.0819641961636 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.