,,, the charts below give information about the way in which water was used in different countries in 2000
The given charts depict the information about consumption of water in different countries such as: Canada, New Zealand, India and China during the year of 2000. The data is calibrated in per century. It is clear and coherent representation.
It can be seen that water used in agricultural was 70%. Secondly water consumption for domestic purpose was 8% only. In addition to this industry had been used 22%.
Apart from this in the Canada 80% water used for agriculture purpose. For the purpose of domestic things only 12% water were used. Industries only use 8% water for manufacturing a products. On the other area like new Zealand used water for agriculture. Domestic purpose and industry purpose were 44 %, 46% and 10% respectively.
In conclusion, the India country consume more water it was92% as compare to other countries.
- the bar charts below show the marriage and divorce statistics for eight countries in 1981 and 1994. 73
- The table below shows the result of a survey of average number of cars per hour using three suburban roads during working hours in a ten year pollution monitoring programme traffic claming was introduced in Harper Lane at the beginning of 1999 83
- The charts below give information about the way in which water was used in different countries in 2000. 56
- The tables below give the information about the world population and distribution in1950 and 2000 with an estimate of the situation in 2050. 67
- the chart below give information about the way in which water was used in different countries in 2000. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 46, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...iven charts depict the information about consumption of water in different countr...
^^
Line 1, column 121, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... countries such as: Canada, New Zealand, India and China during the year of 2000....
^^
Line 1, column 208, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...data is calibrated in per century. It is clear and coherent representation. I...
^^
Line 5, column 179, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a product' or simply 'products'?
Suggestion: a product; products
...ies only use 8% water for manufacturing a products. On the other area like new Zealand use...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, secondly, apart from, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 15.0 33.7804878049 44% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 701.0 965.302439024 73% => OK
No of words: 137.0 196.424390244 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11678832117 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.42121322205 3.73543355544 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86785375694 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.642335766423 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 217.8 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 11.0 22.4926829268 49% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.5590275868 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 58.4166666667 112.824112599 52% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 11.4166666667 22.9334400587 50% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 5.75 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271524920914 0.215688989381 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0915578911338 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0797327894317 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160690757194 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0571845332025 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.4 13.2329268293 63% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.31 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.23 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 11.4329268293 44% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.4 10.9970731707 58% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.