The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison
The given pie charts are portraying the percentage of British students in an English university able to talk in another language in 2000 and 2010.
The charts indicate a considerable drop from 20% to 10% in the percentage of monolingual students over this period. Furthermore, in both years, Spanish was the most spoken language among English students and it experienced an increase of 5% over this period and reached 35% in 2010. French was the next most popular foreign language in 2000 with a share of 15% however, in 2010 both German and French language were favored by 10% of the students. Multilingual English students share also rose from 10% to 15% in 10 years. French, Spanish, and German language aside, about 10% of English students were in favor of other languages which went up to 15% at the end of the period.
In brief, the charts highlight that respectively only 20% and 10% of the students in these two years were not able to speak in another language than English. In addition, the portion of students interested in particular languages underwent a change except for the German language which in both years were spoken by 10% of the students.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-09 | ppatel | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | Duong Linh | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-24 | nguyentuananh76 | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-17 | Jesslynindah | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-01 | Gre user | 78 | view |
- IELTS Task 1 - Tables give information about sales of fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries 84
- TOPIC # 37 Do you agree or disagree that progress is always good? 77
- TOPIC# 22 we all work in jobs with many different kinds of people. In your opinion, what are some important characteristics of a co-worker (someone you work closely with)? 80
- The charts below show the percentage water used for different purposed in six areas of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make compari 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, so, except for, in addition, in brief, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 967.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.835 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62735132786 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.495 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.4818896352 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.875 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 5.23603664747 191% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249078532037 0.215688989381 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129766582712 0.103423049105 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.07102120411 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206434943199 0.15604864568 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0494479198805 0.0819641961636 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.