Many people are optimistic of the 21st century and see it as an opportunity to make positive changes to the world. To what extent do you share their optimism? What changes would you like to see in the new century?
There is no doupt that optimism towards 21st century and its viability to enhance the world is a great concern, especially with the background of rapidly developing technologies I think there are valid arguments for both, approving and diminishing this optimism.
Firstly, the unevitable rise of global problems prevents making rapid improvements to the world. As a result, it will take more than a century to make meaningful positive changes. For instance, global warming causes variety of other issues that humanity has to eliminate first. In addition, part of the humanity that hold most of the money is not interested in solving these problems, because it is a possible source of income that can be exploited. Take for example building companies that may have to work twice due to earthquakes or floods. Lastly, making any changes requires time to see the results, especially speaking of the world itself, that can not be altered quickly by human means.
On the other hand, development of new technologies opens new opportunities to humanity, especially for bringing positive changes to the world. A good example would be water filtration system or environmentally friendly cars. As a predictable outcome, environment would recover from damage caused by humanity over the last few decades. Furthermore, even the small action like planting a tree are already considered to be positive and have significant effect on the world. Lastly, these alterations should not be considered to be only in the field of environment. Thus, enhancing society or other sectors are also considered to be positive alteratior. Consequently, almost any beneficial deed is contributing to the world and can be considered positive. However, positive changes in the environment and medicine are most appreciable.
Overall, I believe that new century allows new positive alternations to take place, without any aberrations preventing improvements.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-31 | JOE Chen | 56 | view |
| 2020-09-30 | prem jariwala | 89 | view |
| 2018-07-26 | mary.ssherr | 69 | view |
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transportDiscuss both the 56
- The line graph shows changing patterns of business communication in New Stratford from 1980 to 2005 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end world poverty and hunger. Others say that economic growth is damaging the environment and should stop. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 56
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Reading the newspaper or online news sources is a waste of time Provide reasons and examples to support your opinion 82
Comments
I understand the optimism…
I understand the optimism surrounding the 21st century, especially with technological advancements. Digital casinos, for instance, have transformed gaming. Platforms like HouseofPokies make entertainment accessible from home. However, there's a growing concern about diminishing face-to-face interactions. I'd love to see more responsible gaming practices in the digital casino industry and technology fostering genuine human connections. Balancing tech advancements with maintaining human essence is essential.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, lastly, may, so, thus, as to, for example, for instance, i think, in addition, speaking of, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1635.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43189368771 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05937678553 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591362126246 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6876282488 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.1875 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8125 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.8125 7.06120827912 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192799573713 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0600953188692 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.05376579359 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111339200691 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0145725504414 0.056905535591 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.